'Urban Disaster' Brewing at Tysons Corner

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Saturday, June 7, 2008; Page A14

The May 29 front-page story "Plan to Remake Tysons Corner Envisions Dense Urban Center" portrayed a future urban utopia and cited Clarendon to show that nearby communities often fear density but like the results. I'd cite Crystal City as an urban disaster. And, having grown up near New York City, I know that density can be overwhelming.

The problem with Tysons Corner's future is the unknowns. With Metrorail already strained, how will an additional line succeed? If Metro doesn't draw people from their cars, won't that doom the whole project? And if we don't have the will to integrate routes 7 and 123 into a walkable center, can we force powerful interests to concentrate growth in pockets? Density spread out is sprawl. If new growth requires a new sewage plant, schools, parks, etc., who will pay for them? Without impact fees, existing residents will subsidize the growth.

Without clear answers, county residents should be skeptical.

DALE MURAD

McLean

The writer is a member of the McLean Citizens Association.


© 2008 The Washington Post Company