The Cuba Embargo Should Stand

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Monday, June 9, 2008; Page A16

In his May 31 op-ed, "Hard-Line Lunacy on Cuba," Eugene Robinson wrote, "For nearly five decades, the United States has pursued a policy toward Cuba that could be described as incredibly stupid" and one that fits the definition for insanity. He implied that the U.S. government can extend an olive branch by ending the decades-old trade embargo. I disagree.

The goal of Cuban authorities has been to maintain themselves in power in perpetuity, even at the expense of improving the living conditions of Cubans, and to undermine the only country that stands in the way -- the United States.

Naturally, those authorities lend support to countries that have the same aspirations. This explains why Fidel Castro, while visiting Iran in May 2001 -- just four months before Sept. 11 -- proudly proclaimed that "Iran and Cuba, in cooperation with each other, can bring America to its knees." Just last September, Cuban Foreign Minister Felipe Pérez Roque indicated that the U.S. embargo had forced Cuba to spend more than $89 billion to get goods and services elsewhere. This is money well spent to keep Americans safe and to keep America on its feet.

Meeting with Cuban officials without preconditions would be counterproductive and would prolong the Cuban people's suffering. Having internationally monitored elections and freeing all political prisoners would be a good way to start these negotiations.

JORGE E. PONCE

Burke

·

I respectfully disagree with Eugene Robinson. U.S. policy on Cuba, supported by presidents from John F. Kennedy to Bill Clinton to George W. Bush, has worked by denying resources to a regime that systematically brutalizes its people and funds anti-American terrorist activities around the world. The Castro brothers have used resources from foreign investors and tourists only to maintain their privilege and power.

Ironically, while some criticize the embargo, it is the American people who are the largest providers of Cuba's food and medicine, and U.S. remittances are the largest source of direct support to the Cuban people. Recent "reforms" by the Cuban regime serve only to highlight the depth of oppression and control under which the Cuban people have lived.

Why do some express outrage against Sudan and Burma yet turn a blind eye to Cuba's half a century of human rights atrocities? Until political prisoners are freed and fundamental human rights are granted, we will not fuel the fires of oppression. We will support real change in Cuba by standing with the Cuban people rather than legitimizing the Castro gulag.

CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ

Secretary of Commerce

Washington

The writer is co-chair of the Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba.


© 2008 The Washington Post Company