| Page 2 of 2 < |
Officers' Free Rides Questioned In Fairfax
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Michael Thompson, president of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, said long-distance driving not only runs up gas and maintenance costs but also adds mileage to the vehicles so that new cars must be bought sooner. "If they're taking them home to Fredericksburg and back, there's something about that that doesn't sit well," Thompson said. "And my bet would also be that before they take it home, it's filled up at a county gas pump."
Thompson said making cars available to the lower-paid patrol officers would also serve as an incentive to stay with the police department rather than moving to higher-paying federal jobs, which often lure well-trained officers.
Fairfax Board of Supervisors Chairman Gerald E. Connolly (D) said that given the high price of gasoline, the county has to be careful about its cars. "Take-home vehicles have to be limited to a strict as-needed basis and within a reasonable radius of the county," he said. He added that 30 miles, as proposed by Rohrer, is too far.
"In defense of the chief, this is a difficult thing to do," Connolly said. "He has to manage the morale of the department. But the taxpayers cannot afford to be sending hundreds of vehicles home long distances from the county. If it made sense once, it doesn't seem to make sense any longer."
Supervisor Pat S. Herrity (R-Springfield) said he wanted to see more cars stay in Fairfax. "I am fully supportive of our uniformed officers that live in Fairfax County driving more cars home," Herrity said. "It's something we should be working toward."
Patrol officers grumble quietly, afraid to offend their superiors and their colleagues with cars. "Once members of the department are given a take-home car, they then move far away from the county," one officer wrote in a letter to the supervisors. "How much gas and pollution are they causing? Would they live that far away if they had to buy their own gas and drive their own car? Would they choose to live in the county?" Many officers say they live outside Fairfax because of its high cost of living. According to county records, the average salary for police officers in Fairfax was about $86,000 last year.
About 100 officers are officially on "standby" status at any one time, Rohrer said. The additional 273 vehicles are issued, Rohrer said, for emergencies when multiple officers and commanders need to be called to duty on short notice.
As an example, he cited the department's SWAT team, which has 12 officers. To have a SWAT team on duty every hour of the day would require an additional 36 officers, he said.
The chief said that hiring one officer costs about $100,000, figuring in salary, benefits and other factors. Instead, all 12 SWAT officers are given county vehicles and "on-call pay," which is one extra hour's pay every weekday and two extra hours pay on Saturday and Sunday.
"What's the cost of 12 on-call pay [officers] and gas?" Rohrer asked. "I know it's cheaper" than hiring 36 more officers. "It is expensive, I don't disagree. But it's more expensive to hire people. . . . I think right now what we're doing is more cost-effective and efficient."
In most units, only one person is officially designated as "on call" and given on-call pay. But often an entire unit of five to 10 detectives has cars. Rohrer said they all have cars in case he needs more than one person from a unit in an emergency.
Even the department's critics agree that officers in SWAT, homicide and narcotics units need cars and are frequently called back. But among some detective units that are seldom called in, few or none of the investigators live in Fairfax, meaning they run up higher gas costs and take longer to return to the county when called in.
Gas and maintenance costs for take-home cars add up. In the 12-month period ending April 30, county records show, Fairfax police used about $3.5 million in gas, at an average cost of $2.54 a gallon. The take-home cars used about $1 million of gas. The county does not pay taxes on the gas it buys, county officials said, and pays about 50 cents a gallon less than the public is charged and 62 cents less a gallon for diesel. So the county is paying about $3.50 a gallon, or a dollar per gallon more than last year.
Similarly, police vehicle maintenance cost the county more than $5.1 million in the 12 months ending April 30. The take-home cars would account for about $1.5 million.
Police were unable to provide a breakdown of what types of vehicles are being driven home. Police records show that of the 1,308 vehicles in the fleet, more than 240 are SUVs or pickup trucks, which are not very energy-efficient.
The Fairfax police officers' union, which doesn't always agree with the chief, supports Rohrer on take-home cars. Officer Marshall Thielen, the union president, said: "If we were staffed as we needed to be staffed, we wouldn't need county cars going home as an operational necessity."
The two area departments most similar to Fairfax in size of force and county are Montgomery and Prince George's. Both have agreements with their unions that allow almost all officers living in the county to have a car but strictly limits who may take a car out of the county. As a result, all but a few officers who live outside those two counties and have an assigned car must park it near the county line and drive their personal cars home.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




