GAO Criticizes U.S. Strategy on Afghan Forces
-
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
After six years and $16.5 billion in spending, the Defense and State departments still lack a "sustainable strategy" for developing Afghanistan's army and police force, government auditors said yesterday.
A Government Accountability Office report said that despite congressional demands, the Bush administration has not provided detailed plans and goals for the effort.
The GAO said the Afghan army, with an authorized force structure of 80,000, now numbers about 58,000 and has "difficulties finding qualified candidates for leadership positions." The reenlistment rate was approximately 53 percent, the report said, and only two of 105 army units "are assessed as being fully capable of conducting their primary mission." It said that "no police unit is fully capable."
In a written response, the Pentagon said the program was "well-reasoned [and] successful . . . despite numerous challenges" and disagreed with a GAO recommendation that Congress consider conditioning future funding on the development of a more comprehensive strategy. The State Department said it was "deeply concerned" about the recommendation, adding that the "Afghan National Security Forces are the backbone of our counterinsurgency efforts."
-- Karen DeYoung
