» This Story:Read +| Comments
Page 2 of 2   <      

Domestic Spending Intact as House Passes War Bill

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The bill was broken into two parts, the first for war funds, which was overwhelmingly supported by Republicans and approved 268 to 155. The second part contained the domestic spending.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

House Democrats had been pressuring their Senate counterparts and the White House to include some revenue and tax increases to pay for the veterans benefit, but they met stiff resistance and abandoned that effort.

Senate Democrats, who have not given their final approval to the plan, still could add money for other domestic measures, including home heating assistance for the poor. Any spending added to the bill would send it back to the House and continue what lawmakers have called a game of "legislative Ping-Pong" that has batted the bill back and forth across the Capitol in the hope of finding the right policy mix.

But Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said yesterday that the package is overall a "pretty good bill" and could pass without changes.

Democrats pointed to two key moments that they say led the White House to support the expanded veterans benefits and unemployment insurance. Last month, 75 senators voted in favor of the domestic portion of the supplement, more than enough to override a Bush veto. And last week, two-thirds of House members supported the unemployment insurance provision in a stand-alone vote.

That vote came after the Labor Department reported that the jobless rate had increased to 5.5 percent in May, the single largest one-month increase since the 1980s.

Emanuel said the unemployment report and the earlier House and Senate votes sent a signal that congressional Republicans did not have the political willpower to support Bush.

"I think he said, 'You know, I don't have a card to hold,' " Emanuel said.


<       2


» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2008 The Washington Post Company