The Price of Flying

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Friday, June 20, 2008

Regarding Patrick Smith's June 14 op-ed, "Don't Hate the Airlines":

How dumb can the airlines be? We know they need to defray fuel costs, so why don't they just raise fares instead of charging annoying fees for services? The net result of charging itemized fees will be longer delays at ticket counters and more unhappy passengers.

JOHN P. DONNELLY

Reston

ยท

Patrick Smith's op-ed touched on a crucial point regarding air travel. When you compare modes of transportation, airplanes would appear to be potentially the most hazardous way to go: Weather is a crucial factor, machines are complex, and pulling over is impossible. In spite of this, flying is by far the safest mode of transportation, and, as a bonus, you get to your destination in a very short time. It takes people to make this happen, and many of these people are paid very little. Complaining passengers have lost sight of what a great deal they have, preferring to stamp their feet like petulant children and insist on the Wal-Martizing of commercial aviation at a time when fuel costs are higher than ever. They should be happy for what they have and be grown-ups about paying for it.

DAVID ABRAHAMSON

Reston


CONTINUED     1           >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company