Courts Can Handle Terrorists
TOOLBOX   Resize
 Save/Share +
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Sen. Barack Obama's comments on terrorism prosecutions ["Candidates Clash on Terrorism," front page, June 18] have particular resonance for me, because I have observed military commission proceedings, including yesterday's, at Guantanamo Bay.
This week's visit is my third trip to Guantanamo, and I have yet to see a hearing run smoothly. The military commission system is mired in controversy and is moving at a snail's pace. Since the first prisoners arrived six years ago, the government has charged just 20 men and obtained only one verdict, a conviction.
Mr. Obama is correct: The 1993 World Trade Center bombing case proves that the criminal justice system can handle terrorism prosecutions, and that case is only one of many examples of that capability.
A recent Human Rights First report examined 123 terrorism cases prosecuted in federal courts and found that the system successfully balances the need to protect classified evidence with defendants' right to fair trials. Criminal prosecutions help, not impede, the fight against terrorism. If the Guantanamo Bay detention center is closed, the cases that can be tried should be transferred to federal courts.
DEBORAH COLSON
Senior Associate
Human Rights First
New York
