McClellan Testifies About Bush Team
Former Spokesman Says Little Beyond Details in His Book

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 21, 2008

Scott McClellan, the former White House spokesman turned Bush administration critic, took to Capitol Hill yesterday to decry an insular and secretive White House that he said lied about the leaking of a CIA officer's name and "overstated" intelligence in the rush to war in Iraq.

McClellan, who served as President Bush's press secretary from 2003 to 2006 and is the author of a controversial new book, also said Bush squandered the public's trust by not following through on promises to fire those involved in disclosing the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson and to publicly divulge details about the case.

"The continuing cloud of suspicion over the White House is not something I can remove, because I know only one part of the story," McClellan said during several hours of testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. "Only those who know the underlying truth can bring this to an end. Sadly, they remain silent."

McClellan was a longtime Bush aide whose best-selling book, "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception," has caused a political uproar. It contains sharp criticism of the president and his senior aides on a variety of topics, including the handling of prewar intelligence and the bungled response to Hurricane Katrina.

The former Bush insider received a warm welcome from the judiciary panel's Democratic majority, which attempted, generally without success, to get him to go beyond the material in his book. Republicans, meanwhile, lined up to question McClellan's motives, attack his publishing house and pressing him on why he did not raise doubts while on the job.

"While we may never know the answers, Scott McClellan alone will have to wrestle with whether it was worth selling out the president and his friends for a few pieces of silver," said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.), the panel's ranking Republican.

The partisan tenor of the hearing appeared to illustrate one of McClellan's central arguments: that Washington is seized by a "permanent campaign" that adheres to a "philosophy of politics as war," as he put it yesterday.

"Too often in Washington, people mistakenly think that loyalty to an individual officeholder should override loyalty to basic ideals," McClellan said in his opening remarks. "This false loyalty is not only mistaken but can exercise a corrupt influence on government."

The White House, which has been unusually sharp in its criticism of a former loyalist, generally tried to ignore McClellan yesterday. "I think Scott has probably told everyone everything he doesn't know, so I don't know if anyone should expect . . . to see anything new today," spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters traveling with Bush.

McClellan returned to several key points during his testimony, including his stance that the Bush administration "sold the nation on the premise that Iraq was a grave and gathering danger" by using intelligence reports that were "overstated" and "overpackaged."

At the same time, McClellan emphasized that he did not believe that Bush or his aides purposely misled the country about Iraq.

Judging from his testimony and book, McClellan was particularly unhappy about the way the Wilson case was handled, including his unwitting role in passing on inaccurate information to reporters.

McClellan recounted a September 2003 episode, described in his book, that revolved around I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's top aide at the time, and Karl Rove, then political aide to Bush. After receiving assurances from Rove, McClellan had told reporters that Rove was not involved in the disclosure of Wilson's identity to the media.

Andrew Card, who was Bush's chief of staff, contacted McClellan on a Saturday and said that Bush and Cheney wanted him to provide the same public assurances about Libby. After speaking to Libby, McClellan said, he informed reporters that Libby was not involved.

Courtroom testimony and other evidence later showed that both Rove and Libby had spoken to reporters about Wilson, although neither was the initial source for Robert D. Novak, whose column was at the heart of the case. Libby was later convicted of lying and obstructing justice. Bush commuted Libby's prison sentence, a move that McClellan criticized.

McClellan was particularly acerbic in his criticism of Rove. He indicated that he believes Rove misled Bush about his involvement in the Wilson case and said that he would not trust testimony from Rove that was not under oath. He also said Bush should have followed through on his promise to fire anyone involved with the leak, including Rove.

"If he had adhered to his word, then Karl Rove wouldn't have . . . been in the administration," he said.

Fratto said the administration is still limited in what it can say about the case because of an ongoing civil lawsuit by Wilson and her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV. "I'm not sure, but maybe McClellan has forgotten the policy, although he repeated it many times from the podium," Fratto said in an e-mail.

Rove declined to comment.

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company