Less Demanding

China takes one small step toward a more rational energy policy.

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Saturday, June 21, 2008; Page A16

NOT ALL the news from the energy front is bad. On Thursday, after a U.S.-China economic summit, Beijing announced that it would raise state-controlled gasoline prices by 17 percent, to about $3.06 per gallon. That's still far below what Chinese motorists would be paying if they had to absorb the full effect of global oil price increases, as Americans do -- but it's a start.

By now, it is conventional wisdom that the surge in oil prices is driven at least in part by booming demand in fast-growing developing countries such as China and India. Until recently, it has been less widely appreciated that developing-world demand was not a purely spontaneous result of economic growth. Government policies designed to hold down the politically sensitive price of energy have artificially stimulated energy consumption.

China and India are hardly alone in this regard. Other big subsidizers have included Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Iran, the Gulf states, Russia and Venezuela. In 2006, the International Energy Agency estimated that total energy subsidies in the 20 largest economies outside of North America, Europe and Japan had reached $220 billion annually; of that, $90 billion went for gasoline, diesel and other oil products. According to a Deutsche Bank forecast before China's policy change, all of the growth in oil demand in 2008 was likely to come from nations that subsidize consumption.

Already facing rising inflation, China undoubtedly would rather have avoided the price increases. And, though the Bush administration has raised the issue with renewed intensity in recent days, the Chinese probably would have ignored U.S. hectoring if they could have. Beijing had no choice, however, because, with oil prices higher than $130 per barrel, fuel subsidies were beginning to drain the national treasury. There has been unrest in other energy-subsidizing countries that have raised prices in recent months, among them Malaysia, India and Indonesia. But there was unrest in China even with price controls because underpaid refineries were cutting back production, leading to shortages and angry gas lines.

The right course, for all of these nations, is to eliminate all subsidies. The blow can and should be cushioned by direct support to the poorest consumers, as Indonesia has provided. Once the initial shock wears off, countries that allow the market to determine prices will feel benefits in the form of fairer income distribution (the wealthy receive a disproportionate share of fuel subsidies) and lower carbon emissions and other pollution. In time, the whole world may benefit from an easing of crude oil prices.


© 2009 The Washington Post Company