Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home
Page 2 of 2   <      

Tainted Money For D.C. Schools

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

As you ponder that question, let's turn to the government of Kuwait.

Fenty's fund pocketed $50,000 from that oil-rich Persian Gulf country, courtesy of its embassy here in Washington.

I've been to Kuwait and know a little something about its history and government. I never knew Kuwait had a deep and abiding interest in the academic advancement of children in the District of Columbia.

So I asked Sara Lasner, executive director of the D.C. Fund for Public Education and a former Fenty aide, how the large donation came about. Lasner wrote in an e-mail: "The Ambassador of the State of Kuwait and his wife know Mayor Fenty and asked how they could help."

Apparently, the mayor hit Kuwait up for some money.

However, about the time that Kuwaiti money was making its way into the mayor's fund, the Treasury Department was designating and freezing the assets of the Kuwait-based Revival of Islamic Heritage Society for its ties to funding terrorism.

The Treasury decision, of course, didn't sit well with Kuwaiti officials. The country's Council of Ministers, chaired by the prime minister, issued a statement defending the charity and charging that the Treasury Department's actions were based on "false" information. Jassem al-Kharafi, speaker of Kuwait's parliament, accused the United States of disrespecting Kuwait's sovereignty and its charities.

Nonetheless, Treasury maintains that it has the goods on the Revival of Islamic Heritage Society and its operations in Kuwait.

Speaking of revival, there is something of an Islamic awakening taking place inside Kuwait.

Recently, Islamist candidates gained a majority in Kuwait's National Assembly. They are among the group of conservative members of parliament who, according to news accounts, would like to ban the observance of Christmas, outlaw Xboxes and bar women from driving.

Last month, 27 female candidates sought seats in parliament. All lost. Two women, however, were appointed to senior government posts. But when they appeared to take the oath of office, several Islamist members of parliament walked out in protest.

By the way, would that Kuwait were as solicitous of foreigners working there as it is of schoolchildren in the District.

A 2008 U.S. Embassy report describes that country, a constitutional monarchy, as a destination and transit center for men and women for forced labor and sexual exploitation.

The report accuses the government of Kuwait of not complying with even the minimum standards for the elimination of human trafficking and of "not making significant efforts to do so."

So why is the D.C. public school system being funded with that source of overseas money? Or with money wrung out of organizations doing business in the city?

And why does the mayor need a private slush fund for public schools, anyway? Public schools are the public's business -- and responsibility. Or at least they should be. Certainly not that of Kuwait or CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield.

kingc@washpost.com


<       2


More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company