Court Chips Away at White House Secrecy

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Del Quentin Wilber and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, July 12, 2008

A federal appeals court dealt a blow yesterday to White House efforts to keep secret the names of people who visited Vice President Cheney.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the White House had prematurely appealed a decision by a federal judge last year that visitor logs are public records.

The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by a watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, seeking information about nine conservative religious leaders who visited Cheney.

White House lawyers argued that the logs are considered presidential records outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act. In December, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that the logs are public records and ordered the Secret Service, which maintains them, to process the group's request. The Secret Service could then try to withhold the information under exemptions in the public records law, according to opinions by Lamberth and the appeals court.

The appellate decision, written by Judge David S. Tatel, sent the case back to Lamberth to consider.



More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2008 The Washington Post Company