Page 2 of 2   <      

Why We Buy Into the Herd, Even When It's Not Good for Us

In a classic example of herd mentality, IndyMac customers line up to withdraw money from the failed bank even though they don't need to. Such actions can exacerbate the problem for everyone, behavioral economists say.
In a classic example of herd mentality, IndyMac customers line up to withdraw money from the failed bank even though they don't need to. Such actions can exacerbate the problem for everyone, behavioral economists say. (By D. Mcnew -- Getty)
  Enlarge Photo    
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

He continued: "But we are quite the opposite for certain types of risk that are human-caused, particularly if they involve something new or mysterious. We react very strongly to that. . . . If people see signs of incompetence or that the system is not being regulated or controlled, that is very worrisome."

In the case of the subprime mess, investors in retrospect worry that the government did not pay enough attention to overseeing complex mortgage-backed securities.

There are emotions at work, too. When herds of people line up outside the bank for money when they don't need to and when they dump shares and bid down, nearly to zero, the value of companies that don't have a corresponding chance at failure, not only are they trying to run to the center of a big group, but they also want to forestall an emotion nearly as strong as fear. That is, regret.

"When you see a lot of people doing something, even if you think it might be dumb, if it turns out that it was the right thing to do and you didn't do it, you will feel really stupid and your sense of self-esteem will take a huge hit," Shefrin said. "What induces people to herd is in many ways the fear of not doing what the crowd did and then the crowd is proven right."

What if everyone was wrong? "It's a lot more comfortable to be with a lot of people who did the wrong thing," Shefrin said. What's remarkable about this type of behavior is that it shows itself in good times and in bad. "During the bull market, investors told me that they bought stocks even though they thought the market was in a bubble because they were terrified of being left out if they were wrong," he added.

And if they were, in fact, correct and made a lot of money from the run-up, their behavior could reinforce similar herd responses for the way back down, making it difficult to ever figure out when to run with the crowd and when not to.

The contrarian investing option during the housing boom would have been to bet that stocks in the financial sector would decline because so many of the mortgages were bogus. But how many average investors sought out research examining the quality of the mortgages? My guess is not many. But several hedge fund managers did, making huge profits. The everyday investors were too busy covering their behinds with the herd.

I asked several behavioral economists whether there was an antidote to all the financial twitching. Upon hearing my question, several laughed, apparently knowing that it is easier to be descriptive than prescriptive when it comes to human behavior. The phrase "that's the $64,000 question" was also mentioned at least twice. But upon pressing them, some answers emerged.

For starters, people need to focus on acquiring information that will get them thinking logically, so they at least know whether to sell (or buy) based on actual information, not gut feeling, and definitely not because the neighbors are doing so. The lining-up at IndyMac is a good example: I wonder how many people went to the FDIC's Web site and read the numerous questions and answers that have been posted.

But roughly speaking, we trust institutions in proportion to how we think they have responded to other crises. If people have a negative memory of how the federal government dealt with, say, Hurricane Katrina, it can affect how they think the government will respond to another crisis. That memory informs our reaction to the new event.

Weber, the Columbia professor, offered a different idea for coping with ourselves: "There are traders who have told me that when they start feeling panicky, they actually stop actively trading and call someone to give them advice. They build their own safety systems to overcome impulse reactions."

For Diane and Steve Rothman, a retired couple from Fairfax County, that's Marjorie Fox, a financial planner. "My human instinct several times has been to call Margie and to tell her to put all the money in oil futures. Let's speculate. Let's take that ride," Steve Rothman said. But he knows that Fox wouldn't buy into the idea and that she would talk him out of it. Fox has diversified their assets across a variety of investments, from stocks to bonds and beyond, just like the textbooks say.

When I had Fox on the phone, I asked her about all this herd selling.

"Should you sell if everyone else is selling?" I asked.

She said, "No. I wouldn't do that."

I said, "Why? Everyone is selling."

She said, "Because at some point, everyone will be buying."


<       2


© 2008 The Washington Post Company