» This Story:Read +| Comments
Page 3 of 3   <      

Ocean Downs Wants to Gamble On Slots; Business Owners Don't

INTERACTIVE
Read the pros and cons of the slots referendum and get information on where the money is going.
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

No individual or facility is guaranteed a license if the referendum is approved by voters. But the legislation was clearly crafted with Ocean Downs in mind. It says that one of the five slots venues would be located in Worcester County within one mile of the intersection of Route 50 and Route 589, where the track is located.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

Rickman took over Ocean Downs in 2001 and shortly thereafter completely renovated the track's clubhouse, which now features a sit-down restaurant called Pacers and rows of televisions that simulcast races from tracks across the country. Ocean Downs is open for betting on those races year-round from noon until midnight.

Speculation about Rickman's involvement in slots has become something of a parlor game itself.

Shortly after O'Malley was elected in 2006, companies affiliated with Rickman and his family gave more than $48,000 to O'Malley's campaign account and an account run jointly by O'Malley and running mate Anthony G. Brown. The donations, logged over just two days, were widely seen as a sign of Rickman's interest in having Ocean Downs included in any slots legislation offered by the governor.

Despite heavy courting by slots supporters more recently, Rickman has given no public indication that he intends to contribute to an O'Malley-backed ballot-issue committee that is working toward passage of the November referendum.

Rickman did not return a phone call seeking comment. During a reporter's recent visit to Ocean Downs, the track's publicity director gave a tour of the facility, including the stables where horses waiting to race were housed. But he declined to discuss slots or where on the property the machines might be located, referring questions to Rickman.

Under Maryland's legislation, slots operators would keep almost one-third of the proceeds, a smaller percentage than Delaware allows Rickman's track there to keep. Another potential Maryland location, in Cecil County, could capture some Marylander gamblers who would otherwise drive to Rickman's Delaware facility, if the issue is approved.

In a March interview, Rickman hedged when asked whether he planned to financially support the pro-slots effort in Maryland, and he cited polling showing majorities favoring the legalization of slots.

"It's going to take a lot of bad press to turn public opinion around," he said.


<          3


» This Story:Read +| Comments

More from Maryland

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Slots for MOCO? Taxes to balance the budget? Get the latest updates here.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company