Slowing Down to Move Ahead
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The Woodrow Wilson Bridge project has begun an experiment to ease traffic flow through the construction zone around the Capital Beltway's Telegraph Road interchange. Our Commuter Page report on the "variable speed limit" system drew this letter.
Dear Dr. Gridlock:
The article on reducing speeds on the Beltway near the Wilson Bridge ("A Beltway Change Tomorrow," July 27) to improve traffic flow reminded me of an article I read in Scientific American in the late 1950s.
The study was on improving congested traffic flow in a New York-New Jersey tunnel by stopping traffic after every 20 vehicles had passed. It showed the empty road space buffered braking incidents, not allowing them to magnify into an avalanching line of braking. Vehicle flow increased, and delays decreased.
I have long tried to adjust my driving speed to anticipate traffic fluctuations ahead. This buffering minimizes brake and acceleration fluctuations for vehicles behind me. Fluctuations cause traffic flow oscillations, as well as increasing gasoline consumption.
The downside is that there are too many drivers whose personal time is more important than that of other drivers. Those people all too frequently speed up to cut into empty space between cars and then need to brake hard, disrupting traffic flow. If more drivers were not so aggressive and creating flow turbulence, we would have reduced commuter times.
Ronald Sheinson
Silver Spring


