ยท An Aug. 8 article about ongoing court disputes over Ohio's voting machines incorrectly said that the state filed a claim Thursday. It was filed Wednesday.
Ohio Sues Over Trouble With Voting Machines
|
Discussion Policy Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. |
The voting-machine wars in Ohio continue.
Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner is assuring voters in the battleground state that November's tally will be accurate even as she asserts -- in court filings yesterday -- that there is a problem with the touch-screen machines to be used in half of the state's 88 counties.
Premier Election Solutions, formerly Diebold, said in May that its machines had some problems tabulating votes. But the company has contended in court filings that it had fulfilled its contract to deliver an electronic system.
During the May primary, Brunner said officials in Butler County, north of Cincinnati, realized that 150 votes were dropped when they were being transferred from memory cards. When Brunner looked into it, she found that the software problem had come up in 11 counties. No vote was lost, she said, because local officials had caught the discrepancies.
Voters "should not be alarmed," Brunner said, because the state will develop and pass on to counties ways to detect and fix the problem.
Premier investigated the Butler County incident, and said in May that the problem could have been caused by the interaction between its software and an anti-virus software. Calls to a Premier spokesman were not returned.
Brunner, saying the machines were delivered with the anti-virus software in place, is seeking punitive damages from the company. She has advocated converting Ohio to paper balloting, arguing that it is more reliable, but was rebuffed by the state legislature.
-- Mary Pat Flaherty


Discussion Policy
