» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
Page 2 of 2   <      

Self-Deportation Has Few Takers

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Nearby, Elisabeth Soto, 54, of Seven Springs, N.C., explained how two decades of lax enforcement have made self-deportation unattractive for illegal immigrants who have set down roots in this country, such as her oldest daughter, 32, whose case was separated from her family's when she got married.

This Story

Soto said her daughter works for pork processor Smithfield Foods, is married to a U.S. citizen and has three children who are citizens by birth. However, she was misled by an adviser to apply for asylum, even though she was not eligible, and now faces deportation after having lived in the United States since 1987.

"We don't have any family in Mexico. If she goes, where is she going to live? What is she going to do?" asked Soto, a grandmother of seven and an 18-year employee of Butterball.

The nation's backlog of immigrant fugitives nearly doubled between 2001 and 2006, before dipping to 572,000 mainly because of an administrative effort to reconcile government records of people who had died, left the country or obtained legal status. Each year, ICE estimated in 2004, 40,000 illegal immigrants join the list of fugitives, ignoring orders to leave the country.

In response, Congress has boosted spending on fugitive arrest operations 20-fold since 2003, and the number of apprehensions each year has climbed from 1,900 to about 30,000. However, even though ICE has increased the number of its fugitive enforcement teams from eight to 75, arrests have fallen far short of the goal of 1,000 per team, making it hard for ICE to keep up with the growing backlog.

Critical lawmakers note that ICE's stated priorities are to first remove fugitives who pose a national security threat, then those with criminal records and then those without criminal records. But deportations of noncriminals grew 91 percent from 2003 to 2007, while those of criminals climbed 16 percent.

ICE agents acknowledge that the pool of criminal fugitives whose court appearances are recent enough to yield good clues about their whereabouts is thinning, making it harder to find fugitives.

Though it has spent more than $1 billion to add detention beds, ICE also faces limits on how many fugitives it can lock up, making initiatives such as Scheduled Departure -- that don't require jail beds -- more attractive.

ICE officials say that the program will cost only $100,000 or so -- the price of advertisements -- and that agents waiting for takers will continue working on other investigations.

They also questioned the motives of enforcement critics who do not urge illegal immigrants to turn themselves in under Scheduled Departure, while criticizing ICE for enforcement raids.

"We are going to find out if people are opposed to methods of enforcement or if they are against any enforcement of the law," said James T. Hayes Jr., acting director of detention and removal operations for ICE.

Charles Kuck, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, called such rhetoric a public relations ploy. Still, he understands, he said, why ICE is conducting raids that anger people and adopting an ineffective policy such as Scheduled Departure to deflect criticism.

"The administration is so desperate to force Congress to act that it will try anything," Kuck said.

Lydersen reported from Chicago.


<       2


» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company