» This Story:Read +| Comments

Balanced Diets for Lighter Laptops

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Rob Pegoraro
Thursday, August 14, 2008

Cheap, lightweight laptops have quietly gotten better over the past year.

This Story

This end of the home-use market is no longer owned by heavy, hot, battery-draining machines running on desktop processors that barely keep up with current software. Not that there isn't a market for such things, but "desktop replacement" laptops poorly serve college students and others who regularly take a computer away from a desk.

Much credit for this improvement goes to a new crop of efficient, compact processors that put out less heat and don't need to be cooled by an array of noisy fans. They've given far more options to budget-minded shoppers who want less than five pounds of laptop hanging off their shoulders.

But here's a downside to this new wealth of portable-PC choices: Almost any new model will do. Buy one with a laptop-optimized processor (Intel's Core 2 Duo has been running away with the light-laptop market) and enough memory (at least a gigabyte on a Mac, 2 GB on a Windows Vista PC), and you can't go wrong.

That was one conclusion from a test drive of four new laptops: Apple's MacBook, Dell's Inspiron 1318, HP's Pavilion tx2500z and Toshiba's Satellite U405-S2854. All featured 12- or 13-inch widescreen LCD screens; weighed just under five pounds; provided more hard-drive space than desktops did a few years ago; and threw in such luxury items as high-speed WiFi, Bluetooth wireless (except on the Dell) and built-in webcams. They'd all suffice for everyday home computing.

But plenty of other things still set them apart.

Let's get the obvious one out of the way first: Mac or PC.

Apple's Mac OS X Leopard makes Windows Vista look clumsy, unmanageable and obsolete. Vista's not nearly as bad as many people regard it, but Microsoft's year-and-a-half-old operating system can't match OS X's simplicity and relative security.

Apple also provides superior music, photo and video programs with its iLife suite; simple and automatic backup tools; and the Boot Camp software that lets you install Windows alongside OS X. Note that of the four tested laptops, only the $1,099 MacBook shipped without any third-party "trialware."

This MacBook ran longer than the other three laptops on one charge while playing a DVD. It lasted three hours and 17 minutes, compared with 2:15 for the Dell (a "pre-production" unit lacking the usual stickers), 2:03 for the Toshiba and 2:00 for the HP.

Buyers who live near an Apple Store can also get free in-person tech support -- something other vendors don't offer.

That said, Apple has put itself at a temporary disadvantage in the cheap-laptop market. The MacBook's basic design has gone two years without major upgrades -- it seems obvious that Apple will redo it soon.


CONTINUED     1        >


» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company