How the Medals Stack Up

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Thursday, August 21, 2008

For a comparison of the Olympic standings among countries, The Post now presents each day the total medal count as if gold, silver and bronze are equal in value or weighting.

Also, in the Aug. 18 edition, a comparison of countries was made on the basis of their per capita medal totals.

Is gold worth more than bronze? Yes.

Greater recognition should be given to the extra competitive accomplishment, prestige and social standing achieved by the winners of gold in relation to winners of silver and bronze.

Even a subjective marginal weighting such as, say, 1.0 for gold, 0.9 for silver and 0.8 for bronze would provide a more realistic impression of country standings.

CLIFF HARDY

Washington



© 2008 The Washington Post Company