» This Story:Read +| Comments

From the Basement, It's No Wonder Radio Reception Is Poor

With 29,000 fans in the stands each game, the Nationals attract more people to the ballpark than on the radio, which averages 26,000 listeners a week.
With 29,000 fans in the stands each game, the Nationals attract more people to the ballpark than on the radio, which averages 26,000 listeners a week. (By Tom Mihalek -- Associated Press)
  Enlarge Photo    

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Paul Farhi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Ah, the dog days of summer. Time to kick back, relax on the porch with a tall glass of lemonade and listen to the quintessential sound of the season: the ballgame on the radio.

This Story

These days, however, hardly anyone's tuning in.

The Washington Nationals, last in the National League East and closing fast on a 100-loss season, have attracted the smallest radio following in the major leagues, according to audience research from Arbitron.

How low? So low that even the microscopic numbers reported by the rating service might be too low to be statistically valid.

The team's broadcasts on the station formerly known as WWWT (107.7 FM and 1500 AM) attracted a cumulative weekly audience of about 26,500 from May through July, the most recent period measured by Arbitron.

The Nationals' following on radio isn't even in the same league as teams with similar records, even those in metropolitan areas with far fewer people than Washington.

The Seattle Mariners, for example, had won just two more games than the 46-85 Nationals as of Sunday. But the Mariners attracted 133,000 listeners per week, or about 26,000 per weekday game, through July.

The low figures give the Nationals the unusual distinction of being a team that has far more people watching its games in person (average attendance has been 29,990 per game) than listening to them on radio.

"The numbers are disappointing," said Jim Farley, vice president of news and programming for Bonneville International, the company that owns the stations carrying Nats games.

Farley says the team's poor record alone doesn't explain the results. "There's no storyline for this season," he says. "Who's the hero? Who's the big star? Even the [famously terrible] '62 Mets had Marv Throneberry. The Nats don't have a character like that. Night after night, the most interesting thing to talk about is that Teddy Roosevelt didn't win [the mascot race] again."

It could be worse -- and probably is.

Arbitron's figures are estimates based on a sample of listeners; as the share of these listeners falls to smaller and smaller fractions, the reliability of the estimates declines as well. Farley concedes that the actual radio audience for the Nationals is "probably lower" than the average reported by Arbitron.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More From Style

[Click Track]

Blogs

Style writers riff on pop music, comics and other topics.

[advice]

Advice

Get words of wisdom from Carolyn Hax, Ask Amy, Miss Manners and more.

[Reliable Source]

Reliable Source

Columnists Amy Argetsinger and Roxanne Roberts dish dirt on D.C.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity