It's Time to Pick, and Roll With It
College Coaches Face Difficult Choices At Quarterback, as the Season Approaches
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Friday, August 29, 2008
From Maryland Coach Ralph Friedgen's position -- seated in a red leather armchair inside his office at the football team's compound -- he could look out a broad horizontal window and see the sun fading over the west end of Byrd Stadium. He raised his glance frequently, over the heads of the half-dozen reporters situated around him, as if the answer to their most pertinent question was left on the field during the scrimmage the Terrapins had just concluded.
Who will be the starting quarterback?
The reporters did not get their answer that mid-August Saturday night. Instead, Friedgen offered a brief glimpse into the complex process of naming a starting quarterback and the key issues that factor into the decision.
Across the country this month, numerous coaching staffs tussled with their quarterback options. As the competitions continued weeks into training camp, coaches were left to analyze who would be the best fit to lead their teams. Each coach has his own formula, but common themes persist.
Ultimately, the choice is crucial; it sets the tone for the offense and for the season. Many coaches waited until days before their team's season opener, insisting their offenses were comfortable with either option. A prolonged wait, though, can prove just as detrimental as picking the wrong guy.
"There is a risk sometimes, yes, particularly when it's a tough battle going on, and it's back and forth and nobody's been able to step up," Virginia Tech quarterbacks coach Mike O'Cain said. "And if it's been made public that at some point you're going to make a call, it could hurt the football team if you don't go and make a decision."
A handful of ACC coaches indicated dates on which they would name a starting quarterback, only to continue their deliberations. North Carolina State Coach Tom O'Brien said he would announce his decision Aug. 20 and then named redshirt freshman Russell Wilson the starter two days later.
Friedgen said he wanted to decide between Jordan Steffy and Chris Turner after the team's final scrimmage Aug. 16. Two days later, Steffy got the call.
Virginia Coach Al Groh also said he would make his choice Aug. 20. Though his team takes on No. 3 Southern California tomorrow, Groh has yet to name a starter from a three-deep candidate pool.
"You try to keep it from becoming a sideshow," Groh said Wednesday during his weekly ACC conference call. "It's something that's of interest to people outside the program but not nearly as much of an interest to people on the team."
That sentiment contrasts with the considerable amount of time, effort and angst a number of coaches said they put into the starting quarterback decision. Each coach differed in his approach, but a consensus was drawn on three factors that weigh heavily in the final decision: good decision-making, ball security and game management.
Oregon offensive coordinator Chip Kelly said that while ball movement is important it does not necessarily make completion percentage a vital statistic. The Ducks named sophomore Justin Roper their starter Monday after a three-week battle with sophomore Nate Costa, who re-injured his surgically repaired left knee Aug. 22 and will miss the season.





