» This Story:Read +|Talk +| Comments

D.C. Benefits From Schwartz's Fight Against Corruption

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Marc Fisher
Thursday, September 4, 2008

After three decades on the D.C. Council and school board, after the death of her husband, after losing four campaigns for mayor, Carol Schwartz says she is "sort of used to having things work out not so well. I've led kind of a chaotic life."

This Story

But the District's only Republican elected official is an eternal optimist, as sunshiny as her bright yellow convertible and as big a booster as this city has ever had.

It's fashionable in this year when the political mantra insists on urgent but undefined "change" to conclude that elected officials who have been around for a long time must be cleared out to make way for a new generation. In Tuesday's Republican primary, a political novice named Patrick Mara, who at 32 is half Schwartz's age, argues that the 7 percent of city voters who belong to the minority party should dump the woman he calls a reckless spender and closet Democrat.

It's certainly true that Schwartz is no comfortable fit in the GOP of Sarah Palin. Schwartz is a champion of gay rights, a self-professed liberal on most social issues and architect of the District's new law requiring businesses to grant a few days of annual sick leave to workers -- a move that has the city's business establishment coughing up big money to get rid of her.

But going back to the Marion Barry era, Schwartz, now in her fourth term as an at-large council member, has been a rare fiscal conservative in a government that views taxpayers as a bottomless source of cash for every fly-by-night contractor and every community group that purports to be doing something good.

When her deep adenoidal voice rings out in a council hearing room, it's often the public's only chance to discover how the millions vanish and how little the people get in return. Not a real Republican? Well, maybe, but it is Schwartz who has spent the past year and a half preventing movement on Barry's bill that would give ex-offenders special protection under the city's human rights law.

"I don't think if you are a jewelry store, you should have to hire a jewel thief and if you don't hire them, they could sue you and the city has to pay for the lawyer," Schwartz says. "I mean, please."

And she's frozen for nearly two years a bill that would force such large retailers as Macy's or Target to pay the city's $11.75 an hour "living wage." She says: "It would chase away exactly the kind of retailers we're working so hard to bring into our city, so I bottled it up. And I'm anti-business?"

(Schwartz says she's voted for all but one Republican presidential candidate in her voting career; she coyly refuses to say which one.)

Only the District's 30,000 registered Republicans get to decide whether Schwartz stays or goes -- she says she's unlikely to mount a write-in campaign as an independent should she lose the primary -- but the entire city benefits from Schwartz's non-ideological insistence that the city cannot afford the corruption and incompetence that has held it back for so long.

"She's beyond meticulous about knowing where every dollar is spent," says Lawrence Guyot, a longtime Democratic activist who says he works to defeat all others save Schwartz and former Republican David Catania (I-At Large). "She is where the Republican Party should be, watching the spending without opposing helping people."

Mara, who says he has knocked on the doors of more than 5,000 D.C. Republicans, argues that Schwartz's actions are so far from party principles that most voters he talks to don't even know what party she represents. "She doesn't use the word 'Republican' in her literature, she's never endorsed Republicans in local elections, and most of her staff are Democrats," he says.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Talk +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity