» This Story:Read +|Watch +|Talk +| Comments
Page 2 of 2   <      

Radical Options In Play for New Structure of Firms

Any plan requires the approval of Congress, where sharp disagreements over whether Fannie and Freddie's new structure could take most of next year to resolve, lawmakers say.
Any plan requires the approval of Congress, where sharp disagreements over whether Fannie and Freddie's new structure could take most of next year to resolve, lawmakers say. (By Jay Mallin -- Bloomberg News)
  Enlarge Photo    
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

If Congress were to nationalize the two firms, Fannie and Freddie would become government agencies. They could not raise money by selling stock to investors, nor would their shares be traded on the markets. Instead they would rely on public funding. The structure would be similar to Ginnie Mae, a government-owned corporation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development that backs mortgages from several agencies.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

If the firms were privatized or liquidated, several large banks have said they are eager to compete in the business of buying loans from mortgage originators. Douglas J. Holtz-Eakin, senior policy adviser to McCain, and others say the private sector could replace Fannie and Freddie's role in the marketplace. Fannie and Freddie's mandate to provide money for affordable-housing loans could be taken up by an agency such as HUD, which already operates the Federal Housing Administration loan program.

Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.), who has been one of the fiercest critics of the GSEs, or government-sponsored enterprises, on Capitol Hill, said in an interview that Treasury's requirement for the companies to reduce their portfolios seems to be "a step in the right direction." But, he added, "ultimately the GSEs need to be totally privatized."

Democrats, for their part, say the Treasury's takeover demonstrates that the company's public mission is vital and needs to be preserved. "Most Democrats believe Fannie and Freddie need restructuring," Schumer said, "but their overall mission to help ensure affordable housing must remain intact."

Jason Furman, Obama's economic policy director, warned that some of the GOP positions would do more harm than good. "This is a complex problem that doesn't lend itself to a simplistic ideological solution," he said. "The root of solving it is how to disentangle the public functions . . . from the things that the private sector can and should be doing."

Staff writer Lori Montgomery contributed to this report.


<       2


» This Story:Read +|Watch +|Talk +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company