| Page 2 of 2 < |
Market Welcomes Takeover
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The fine print of the plan could contribute to new risks. For example, the government decided to protect investors in "subordinate" debt in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- investors who had agreed to take on more risk and higher returns.
"What I worry about here is that subordinated debt holders of other truly private banks may start to think they will also be protected if their banks fail," said Douglas W. Elmendorf, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
Government officials behind the takeover believed they had to protect debt holders. Otherwise the companies would have had massive numbers of creditors demanding to be paid back immediately.
The Treasury's move triggered one of the largest defaults in history for the $60 trillion market for credit default swaps. These are privately tradable instruments that allow investors to make side bets on the likelihood a company will default on its bonds. Even though Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's bonds were protected in the rescue plan, the companies' transition into conservatorship was the equivalent of a bankruptcy for credit default swap traders, according to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.
An estimated $1.4 trillion worth of credit default swaps is traded on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's bonds, according to Bloomberg.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator that will run Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, continued to hammer out details yesterday about how the companies would operate under its control.
Government officials said the companies would probably expand their lending programs to make mortgages available to more borrowers. The companies had curtailed lending in recent months as their financial condition worsened. "The companies were starting to contract, and that was not very useful. One of the things we can do is serve this mortgage market better," said an official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the government was still working out details with the companies. "They were having trouble fulfilling this mission."
For now, the agency will play a large role in shaping decisions at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But the government official said that over time, the companies' new chief executives would have greater independence, and the regulator would return to its role of just monitoring the companies' books. The agency is "going to fade back to being the examiner," the official said.
Government officials emphasized that the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and not the Treasury Department, would be in the driver's seat.
New Freddie Mac chief executive David Moffett and Fannie Mae's new chief executive Herb Allison, longtime industry officials named by the government to run the companies, held meetings yesterday to talk about the companies' plans.
At a staff meeting with several hundred employees at Fannie Mae headquarters in Northwest Washington, Allison was asked whether there would be layoffs. Jobs are secure, he said, according to a person familiar with the meeting.
Immediate layoffs are not expected at Freddie Mac, either. The firms will continue to pay the same salaries, benefits and pensions to employees, though the federal regulator and new management are examining whether to revise the compensation system. No decisions have been made about the companies' boards.
The departing chief executives, Richard Syron of Freddie Mac and Daniel Mudd of Fannie Mae, are remaining with the companies for a transition period. Mudd and Syron were told in meetings with senior government officials on Friday that they would have to step down.
Paulson believed they had to be fired to send a signal that the top people at both firms were being held accountable for the companies' troubles, government officials said. Syron had already been planning to leave the company.
News of the takeover sent a chill through the nonprofit world. The companies have put millions of dollars into local charitable organizations -- something the government said was being reviewed.
"The possibility that they might disappear from the philanthropic scene is making people even more nervous," said Lindsey Buss, president of Martha's Table, a District nonprofit group. Buss said he hadn't spoken with his usual contacts at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. "I don't feel comfortable calling right now," Buss said. "They're probably wondering if they have jobs."
Staff writers Lori Montgomery, David Cho, Kendra Marr and Heather Landy in New York contributed to this report.




