It's a Disability, Not a Death Sentence
TOOLBOX   Resize
 Save/Share +
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
It seems everyone has an opinion about Gov. Sarah Palin's decision not to abort her son Trig when she learned he would be born with Down syndrome.
When did Down syndrome come to be seen as such a horrible disability? I grew up with an aunt who had Down syndrome, so maybe that's why I never saw it as a disability, but some who have been writing and speaking about it make it seem as if it's a horrible disease and a massive burden on the families of those who have it.
I am pro-choice, but when 90 percent of pregnancies involving Down syndrome are aborted, this seems more like selective breeding. Michael Gerson ["Trig's Breakthrough," op-ed, Sept. 10] said "parents report that genetic counselors and physicians emphasize the difficulties of raising a child with a disability and urge abortion."
Isn't a child who has autism or
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder just as challenging? How far are we from a gene test that identifies these disabilities, and would doctors still recommend abortion? Considering how many children are found to have these learning disabilities, we'd be close to wiping out a population.
Maybe instead of encouraging parents to abort simply because a fetus has Down syndrome, doctors should make it a practice to educate parents and inform them that it isn't a death sentence.
MICHELE FORDEMWALT
Washington
