| Page 3 of 3 < |
D.C. Legislation Would Remove More Gun Limits

Buy Photo
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said yesterday that he had received a call explaining the bill from one of its most prominent supporters, Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.). Reid said he had not yet looked at the legislation.
"We have a lot of things to do in a short period of time," he said.
Opponents note that the bill has not attracted much attention in the Senate, unlike in the House, where the measure has 117 co-sponsors, including 57 Democrats.
"We think we've got a better chance of defeating it in the Senate, or keeping it from coming to a vote," Helmke said.
Some critics say House leaders, who have supported the District's quest for more autonomy, are allowing a vote on the gun bill only because they assume it will go nowhere in the Senate.
"I think the Democrats are trying to give cover to members in pro-gun districts, allowing them to take a meaningless vote," said Brian McNicoll, a spokesman for Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.).
The House leadership agreed to allow a vote on the D.C. gun bill after Republicans appeared to be gaining enough support from conservative Democrats to bring a similar measure to the floor themselves. Such a move would be deeply embarrassing to the House leadership and could fracture the party's House contingent.







