washingtonpost.com
The Slots Debate's Other Leading Faces

Monday, September 22, 2008

Comptroller Peter Franchot

In the fight against slots, Comptroller Peter Franchot (D) has cast himself as both a leading opponent and an Annapolis outsider.

Last week, Franchot took his message to a conference of African Methodist Episcopal ministers at the Greater Mt. Nebo Church in Prince George's County.

The comptroller asked for the group's help in rejecting adding slots in a Nov. 4 measure put on the ballot by Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) and the Democrat-led General Assembly.

"We see what comes out of Annapolis," Franchot said. "We know we can't trust them."

Comments like those have irked Democratic leaders in Annapolis, where Franchot, a one-time slots supporter, served for 20 years as a delegate representing Montgomery County before he was elected as the state's chief tax collector in 2006.

If anything, the anger of his former colleagues seems to have emboldened Franchot, who says his views on slots have evolved while on the campaign trail.

At Greater Mt. Nebo, he said that many of the Maryland politicians now advocating slots are "the same people who brought you a record tax increase a year ago."

That was a reference to nearly $1.4 billion in new taxes passed in a special session O'Malley called to deal with the state's finances. Adding slots is also envisioned by O'Malley as part of the budget fix.

Franchot argued that the social costs of legalizing slots would surpass their revenue. He also took aim at claims by supporters that education would benefit from slots revenue, dubbing that "the biggest lie."

A November defeat on the issue would undoubtedly energize Franchot to continue an "independent" streak in Annapolis that has extended to other issues besides slots.

Approval, his detractors hope, might rein him in.

-- John Wagner

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr.

During the past six years, there has not been a more powerful slots supporter in the General Assembly than Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. -- which makes it difficult to believe he is largely staying on the sidelines during the fall campaign.

"I give the people more credit than do most of my colleagues," Miller (D-Calvert) said about the referendum. "Consistently, the public has said, 'If you're putting the money into education, we're for slots.' "

Miller, who muscled ill-fated slots bills through the Senate several years in a row, acknowledged that he will not stay entirely silent about an initiative on which he and former governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) were aligned during the previous administration.

Miller has agreed to debate slots opponents at a couple of public forums, and he will send a mailer to residents of his legislative district, which includes part of Prince George's County, voicing support for the passage of slots, as well as for the presidential candidacy of Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

One person Miller said he has no desire to debate: Comptroller Peter Franchot (D), his Annapolis nemesis on slots and other issues.

"I won't give him that satisfaction," said Miller, who has presided over his chamber for more than two decades.

Something else longtime Miller watchers might find surprising: He is now cautioning about Maryland becoming too reliant on slots revenue.

"You can't get too dependent on it," Miller said.

"It's not the cake. It's the icing on the cake."

-- John Wagner

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company