One Year Later, Some Details in Fatal Shooting of 14-Year-Old

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Courtland Milloy
Wednesday, September 24, 2008

For a year, District residents have waited for the details to come out about the death of 14-year-old DeOnté Rawlings, one of the District's most controversial police shootings. City officials have withheld details, hiding behind the confidentiality of the grand-jury process even though the officers' accounts were first given to police investigators, not the grand jury.

But on Friday, Gregory L. Lattimer, an attorney for the Rawlings family, obtained copies of the interviews with the two D.C. police officers involved. I listened to Officer James Haskell's version of events yesterday. I hope to report on Officer Anthony Clay's version later.

Haskell's account, which absolves him, is by no means definitive or necessarily accurate. Lattimer calls it "nonsensical." But it's his version, which the public should hear:

On the evening of Sept. 17, 2007, he and Clay, both off-duty, were riding through an alley in a Southeast public-housing complex, searching for a stolen minibike. The officers are neighbors, and the bike had been stolen from Haskell's garage.

Not long after the search began, they saw a boy on the bike ride past them in the opposite direction. Haskell threw his Tahoe sport-utility vehicle into reverse and, with Clay riding shotgun, sped backward down the alley until they caught up with him.

"Drop the bike," Haskell told the youth.

"What? What?" he answered.

The boy was Rawlings -- and in less than a minute, he would be dead from a gunshot fired by Haskell.

Haskell told investigators that DeOnté "drops the bike and instead of running off, he goes into his pocket, and out comes the gun. I say, 'God, he's got the drop on me.' " DeOnté was standing about nine feet from the vehicle. When Haskell began reaching for his gun, which was holstered at his side, he said, DeOnté opened fire.

"He shot twice before I could point my gun out the window," Haskell said. "It was like 'bang, bang,' and then I fired twice from inside the vehicle. And he's running away and still firing. Then I get out of the car and he's still firing, and I began firing some more, and he drops." Asked by investigators if he identified himself as a police officer, Haskell said no. Both officers were out of uniform and riding in Haskell's personal vehicle.

Asked by investigators to describe how DeOnté was firing and running at the same time, Haskell said the boy was running with what police later said was a .45-caliber semiautomatic in his right hand while firing back over his left shoulder. Lattimer, a former assistant D.C. corporation counsel who specializes in police abuse cases, doesn't buy it. He has filed a $100 million wrongful-death lawsuit against the city on behalf of DeOnté's family.

"You've got a kid who is 5-foot-2, weighs 105 pounds, supposedly firing a powerful .45-caliber semiautomatic with one hand like it was a toy," Lattimer said. "But nobody can find the gun. There are no shell casings found within 100 feet of where the shooting supposedly began, and there is not a trace of residue, gunpowder or soot on DeOnté or his clothes, even though he was wearing a white T-shirt and muzzle fire was supposedly coming out over his shoulder."


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company