Smarter Spending on National Security
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
The Oct. 13 Business article "Balancing Defense and the Budget" rightly pointed out that the costs of the financial bailout will exert downward pressure on the military budget. This is all the more reason to make sure that dollars spent on national security are invested as efficiently as possible. That means embracing a broader vision of defense that gives greater weight to nonmilitary tools of security.
Spending on nonmilitary policy tools -- from diplomacy to alternative energy sources -- has the potential to help prevent conflicts in the first place.
This, in turn, can reduce the budgetary burden of defense. A task force sponsored by Foreign Policy in Focus and the Center for Defense Information -- on which I served -- has proposed a first step in this direction, a Unified Security Budget that would shift more than $60 billion from weapons spending to diplomacy, alternative energy, development assistance and other civilian instruments of security.
There is no time like the present to begin moving in this direction.
WILLIAM D. HARTUNG
Director
Arms and Security Initiative
New America Foundation
New York
