» This Story:Read +|Talk +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments
ANTI-TAX PROPOSAL

Montgomery Measure a Sign of the Times

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Ann E. Marimow
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 6, 2008

Whether an anti-tax measure on the ballot in Montgomery County eventually passes or fails, its relative success in Tuesday's election is a sign of voters' anxiety and rising unease with the tax policies of county leaders.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story
This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

The measure, which would make it more difficult to raise the limit on property tax revenue in the traditionally liberal county, was leading by a few hundred votes yesterday. But the final outcome won't be determined until more than 49,000 absentee and provisional ballots are counted in the next two weeks.

For more than three decades, low-tax activist Robin Ficker, a onetime state legislator and Bethesda real estate broker, has pressed for stricter limits on local property tax increases. None of his so-called "Ficker amendments" has succeeded.

Ficker's opponents attributed his traction this year in part to public protest of the council's budget deal in the spring that raised taxes on the average homeowner by about 13 percent.

"It's an unmistakable message to the government to live within its means," said Jerry Pasternak, who worked to defeat Ficker's efforts as an adviser to former county executive Douglas M. Duncan (D).

Council member Phil Andrews (D-Gaithersburg-Rockville) said voters want the council to "spend less rather than tax more, and that's what they are likely to see in the next year."

Ficker said yesterday he is "very optimistic" that the absentee votes will go his way because most were sent before the opposition heated up. He said county residents are "fed up" with a series of increases in state and local taxes and fees.

"You have this whole flotilla of tax increases coming down on people, and county officials still wanted more," Ficker said.

The proposal would amend the county's charter to require a unanimous vote of all nine council members to exceed the limit on property tax revenue, rather than the current requirement of seven votes.

In practical terms, the measure would probably not have a significant impact in the next year or two. County Executive Isiah Leggett (D) has said he will not recommend that the council exceed for a second year the property tax limit, which ties increases to roughly the rate of inflation. And in the past 14 years, all but two of the council's budgets have had the unanimous support of the council.

In the long term, though, opponents say they worry that it would limit the council's flexibility to pay for public services in tough economic times and put too much power in the hands of one council member to hold up the budget.

"If this survives, you never know about the makeup of future councils," Leggett said. "It's serious in terms of good governance and policy."


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Talk +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments

More from Maryland

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Slots for MOCO? Taxes to balance the budget? Get the latest updates here.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity