| Page 2 of 2 < |
Nice But Tough
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The Obama transition team wants access to more than just mechanical information on how the government works. Given all the information they collected during the campaign, there should be relatively few surprises when they actually drop-into departments and agencies like the 101st Airborne in World War II. The Obama team did a great deal of homework before the election and started writing briefing memos long before Obama announced his planning effort last July. Indeed, the outline of the transition's soon-to-be-published book of transition essays was set last April. If the Obama team needs a primer on what to do now, they did not do their jobs during the campaign.
This is where the conflict begins. Sooner or later, and likely sooner, the Obama team must ask for the list of new Bush initiatives designed to extend the outgoing administration's hold on power. As the Post also reported this past weekend, a secret group of Obama advisers has already identified dozens of Bush decisions that can be reversed on Inauguration Day. They will be looking for more. This is the kind of information the Bush administration is unlikely to give up without a fight.
The Obama team must be particularly watchful for last-minute regulations. The uptick in activity is already obvious in the Federal Register, which chronicles the rule-making process, and in internal memos leaked from the career civil service. As the Bush Administration discovered in trying to reverse the Clinton administration's arsenic rule in 2001, regulations that survive the formal rule-making process are nearly impossible to overturn without legislation or a new and elongated rule-making process that must establish some basis for starting anew. The way to stop new rules is to fight them before they are promulgated, which means now.
None of this means that the transition will turn nasty. Expect the teams to be civil and cooperative until the incoming administration starts asking for lists of pending decisions. The Bush administration's department and agency may be built around civil servants, but they are all led by chiefs of staff to secretaries and administrators who have regular conference calls with the White House. No doubt those calls are mostly concerned with the benchmarks of cooperation, but the chiefs of staff are also there to stop the Obama representatives from digging too deeply.
The transition can be eminently civil, but it will also be political. The Bush administration is hardly a paragon of transparency, and cannot be expected to open its vault of pending decisions for full inspection even if asked with sugar and spice. The Obama team will not pound the table, but it will be insistent. There is conflict ahead. Get ready.
Paul Light is a professor at New York University's Robert Wagner School of Public Service and author of "A Government Ill Executed." He is writing an occasional analyis for this page.

Political Browser: 

