Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home

Change From the Top

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Friday, November 28, 2008; Page A29

Sound the alarms, man the barricades, alert the producers! Barack Obama, agent of change, isn't a-changin'.

As the president-elect recycles Clintonistas into Cabinet appointments -- even considering Hillary for secretary of state -- and appears set to keep Bush's defense secretary for at least another year, conventional wiseguys are wondering: Where's the change?

Perhaps we're looking for change in all the wrong places. In other ways, less apparent but of long-term importance, Obama may be the change he promised.

Setting aside the obvious -- his use of complete sentences, free of words yet to be discovered -- he is uniquely positioned to change the world on multiple levels.

As Jeff Gedmin, president of Radio Free Europe, recently suggested: Obama is a weapon of mass attraction. That attractiveness isn't just physical but a matter of style.

Before the harrumphers tune up, no one's arguing for style over substance, but style does matter. Style isn't only cosmetic but has to do with the way one enters and takes a room's temperature.

Style is the instinct to swagger -- or not.

Speaking recently at the Ethics and Public Policy Center about public diplomacy, Gedmin pointed out that George Bush's "bring 'em on" cowboy style worked for about half the American people and about 5 percent of the globe. By comparison, he said, Obama's style resonates with about 90 percent of the world.

Both Gedmin and fellow speaker Kenneth Pollack -- a Persian Gulf expert and author of "A Path Out of the Desert" -- agreed that the messenger, as well as the message, matters. How successfully the United States communicates its interests to the rest of the world turns in part on who is delivering the information and how the "sale" is pitched.

"Sale" gets quotation marks because, says Pollack, we need to stop thinking in terms of selling and advertising. Rather, the best marketing tool for "selling" liberal democratic values (much like religious conviction) is by living those values, rather than preaching or trying to impose them.

Sometimes our values and interests intersect, sometimes they don't. To the extent Obama understands that concept -- and he seems to -- he is change.

On the domestic front, what does he offer?


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company