Help That Defense Contractors Don't Need
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
In his Dec. 3 Federal Diary column, "Another Obstacle for Affirmative Action, and Congress Is Prepared to Fight," Joe Davidson urged Congress to overturn a federal court of appeals decision that struck down the Defense Department's use of racial preferences in its contracting ("the Pentagon [would] increase bids from white-owned companies by 10 percent before comparing them to firms owned by people of color").
Such discrimination, besides being divisive and unfair, also wastes the taxpayers' money. Mr. Davidson argued that the preferences "right a long series of wrongs" and would make "government acquisition programs work for everyone," but, in fact, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. got it right when he wrote in a Supreme Court opinion last year: "The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."
The way to ensure nondiscrimination is by ensuring greater transparency and widespread publication of bidding opportunities, not through institutionalized racial preferences.
ROGER CLEGG
President and General Counsel
Center for Equal Opportunity
Falls Church
