Page 2 of 4   <       >

Bailing Out the Automakers

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

It wasn't enough for us to be bilked out of $700 billion to bail out grossly mismanaged financial institutions. Now the president has decided, without congressional approval, to serve the equally mismanaged auto industry a morsel of that $700 billion pie -- $17.4 billion in emergency loans -- to tide it over until our next president bakes his own pie.

By voting down the auto industry bailout, Congress served us well for the first time in a long time. It's a shame the president didn't follow suit and deny a bailout for the Big Three, forcing them into Chapter 11 reorganization, which is where they belong.

MICHAEL J. LEGGIERI JR.

Frederick

ยท

If union members will have their wages reduced to match those of employees at non-union plants [front page, Dec. 20], why shouldn't executives at GM and Chrysler be subject to the same requirement? Executives at Japanese auto companies must find it laughable that the leaders of the U.S. carmakers receive multiples of their own salaries even as those U.S. companies lose billions of dollars.

JOSEPH H. GUTTENTAG


<       2           >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company