Colleges See Advantages in Designating Future Football Coaches in Advance
Friday, December 26, 2008
More than a decade has passed since DeLoss Dodds last had to hire a football coach, and in that time much has changed about the task. When Dodds, the University of Texas men's athletic director, brought Mack Brown to Austin in 1998, the process was fairly simple: Identify a desirable coaching candidate, make him an offer and sign him up.
These days, the process is often a fierce competition involving buyouts, counteroffers and even potential lawsuits, and Dodds figured he could do without the extra headaches. So even though Brown, 57, has stated no intention of retiring anytime soon, Texas announced last month that first-year defensive coordinator Will Muschamp, 37, eventually will assume the reins of the Longhorns' program.
Texas is one of a handful of schools that have utilized the "coach-in-waiting" tag in recent years. As the practice of hiring head coaches has become increasingly complicated and the benefits provided by the appearance of long-term stability have become more diverse, Florida State, Oregon, Kentucky and Purdue also have developed succession plans to deal with upcoming or eventual changeovers.
"It seemed to us that it was such a problem to go through all that [trouble] when the program's in good shape, and that you can train somebody from the inside and have a seamless kind of transition when the time came," Dodds said. "So if the right person was in the ranks, it seemed to us that it was best to keep them there and grow them and put them in the position when the time came."
The recent trend of college football programs naming coaches-in-waiting began in July 2005, when longtime Wisconsin coach Barry Alvarez announced he would retire at season's end and turn over the program to defensive coordinator Bret Bielema. Since taking control in 2006, Bielema has compiled a 28-10 record. Tomorrow, Wisconsin (7-5) will meet Florida State (8-4) in the Champs Sports Bowl.
School officials were quick to point out this method is not right for every situation and that football programs must possess certain qualities to pull off such an approach.
At Purdue, for instance, succession plans have been executed in both football and men's basketball over the past five years. In each case, according to Athletic Director Morgan Burke, the respective programs already were headed in the right direction and needed a fresh, yet familiar, hand at the helm.
In the spring of 2007, football coach Joe Tiller approached Burke about setting a time frame for the end of his career. After establishing that Tiller would retire following the 2008 season, Burke set out to identify candidates who would be amenable to learning under Tiller's tutelage for a year before taking control of the team.
Burke's search team, which included Tiller, selected Danny Hope, then the head coach at division I-AA Eastern Kentucky and someone who previously had worked with Tiller at Purdue. Hope, who was hired in January, signed two contracts -- one stating he would serve as the team's associate head coach for one season and another designating him the team's head coach effective Jan. 1, 2009, through the following five seasons.
"Danny's responsibilities were clearly defined," Burke said. "He was going to be the offensive line coach, which was what he had been with Joe in the past. He wasn't going to be the offensive coordinator. And we had an understanding that Danny was pretty much off the media platform in terms of commenting on the program."
Schools that make a coaching change at the conclusion of a season often have to rush to hire a new leader, then rush some more to fill out a recruiting class in the six weeks between the conclusion of the regular season and the mid-January signing day.
Even for coaches whose jobs are not at risk, recruiting can become treacherous territory. Bobby Bowden has led Florida State to two national championships, 12 conference titles and more than 300 wins since he took over in 1976. But at 79, Bowden knows other programs will try to lure away recruits by pointing to the uncertainty of his coaching future.