washingtonpost.com
U.S., Japan Negotiate Over Whaling Limits
New Type of Hunting May Be Allowed

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 25, 2009

The United States is initiating a closed-door negotiation that could open up new areas to whale hunting for the first time in decades, part of an attempt to end a long-standing impasse over whaling limits with Japan, the world's most avid whaling nation.

The tentative plan, outlined in documents obtained by The Washington Post, seeks to achieve a breakthrough in the dispute that has raged since the International Whaling Commission voted in 1986 to ban commercial whaling. Faced with the reality that Japan and its allies have continued to hunt whales and have succeeded in blocking new conservation efforts, commission Chairman William Hogarth -- an appointee of President George W. Bush -- has been trying this weekend in Hawaii to craft a pact that would permit a new type of "coastal whaling" in exchange for a commitment by Japan to scale back its "scientific" whale hunts.

The proposal is running into stiff opposition from whaling opponents, however.

In recent years, the whaling commission, which requires a supermajority vote to take action, has been deadlocked between the anti- and pro-whaling camps. Rather than setting a clear direction for conserving and managing whale populations worldwide, its meetings have become contentious donnybrooks in which the two sides have competed for influence while little changed.

Worldwide, three countries -- Japan, Iceland and Norway -- continue to hunt whales, either in the name of research or, in Norway's case, under a commercial exception established more than 20 years ago.

The draft proposal, which does not specify how many whales could be killed under the plan, would allow Japan to engage in "coastal whaling" off its shores in exchange for a cut in the number of Antarctic minke whales it takes each year in the Southern Ocean. Several anti-whaling nations have pushed for the creation of a whale sanctuary in the Southern Ocean, the site of the current whale hunt. The coastal whaling provision would apply only to Japanese coastal waters, and it is unclear whether it could be expanded.

In an interview, Hogarth said he knew it would be controversial to condone a new form of whaling, but he argued that it probably is essential to reach an agreement with Japan.

"Even though we might not like this specific aspect, it's better than what we have now, the status quo," he said. "Everyone would like to see that there are less whales killed."

Joji Morishita, Japan's chief negotiator on the commission, said in an e-mail that the outcome of the negotiations could determine whether the international body will continue to function.

"It's decision time," he said. "Very important, very serious decisions need to be taken. It is a critical time for this organization. The IWC could still collapse."

Scientists and environmentalists questioned the proposal, noting that it could increase pressure on small coastal whale stocks without ending the whaling Japan has conducted for years. Japan has begun taking more whales in recent years under the science designation, killing 872 in 2007, compared with 540 in 1997. In addition, Japan reported that in 2007 it accidentally killed 156 minke whales off its coast as bycatch. Korea -- which no longer intentionally hunts whales -- caught 80 coastal minkes as bycatch and identified 14 others as illegally killed.

Norway caught 597 whales in commercial hunts in 2007. Iceland, which conducts scientific and commercial whaling, killed 45 that year.

Scott Baker, associate director of the Marine Mammal Institute at Oregon State University and a U.S. scientific delegate to the commission, said the Sea of Japan is home to a depleted population of minke whales classified as "J-stock" whales. Allowing ships from Japanese coastal villages to target nearby whales in the northwestern Pacific, he said, could hurt a population that has already declined because of bycatch and intentional hunts.

"That is politically, in some ways, appealing, but it does seem it's going to increase pressure on these local stocks," Baker said, adding that limited whaling activity by Japan in the region "is a threat now," even without the increase envisioned under the compromise.

Patrick Ramage, who directs the global whale program at the International Fund for Animal Welfare, called the proposal "a lousy idea." He added: "Declaring open season on Japan's coasts would have grave implications for vulnerable whale stocks."

Hogarth headed the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Service for nearly seven years and was selected by Bush in February 2006 to serve on the whaling commission. Hogarth said he tried to broker a compromise because he became convinced that the current process is broken. He recruited three outside experts to chair a series of meetings, which are closed to nongovernmental observers and the media.

"They're closed meetings, but they're not secret," he said, adding that he plans to issue a public proposal on Feb. 2 that the commission members will openly debate a month later. The negotiations remain tense and could fall apart at the last minute, he said. "I'm not trying to paint a rosy picture, because it's very, very tough."

Ramage questioned why Hogarth would push such a controversial proposal now that President Obama has taken office: "The Bush administration has decided to wave the white flag on whaling and say, 'We can't end this,' and we're saying, in the words of a certain presidential campaign, 'Yes, we can.' "

Hogarth said he is well aware that he could be replaced before the pact is finalized or be instructed to kill the deal. Obama could "decide he doesn't want me, and I respect that," he said. "I will make sure they are on board with the process we're doing."

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company