Whistleblower Protections In the Stimulus Package
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
The Feb. 2 editorial "Wrong Way to Protect" questioned the wisdom of including federal whistleblower protections in the stimulus package.
This concern was based on various provisions in the law, most notable being the possible release of classified information.
The Post missed the big issue by focusing on a few technical problems in the bill. House advocates from both parties were well aware of these problems and had agreed to resolve them in the House-Senate conference process. The House sponsors made this pledge directly during the floor debate in the House.
The real issue is oversight and accountability:
How can we best ensure that taxpayers will be protected when thousands of contractors are given hundreds of billions of dollars?
Every major study concludes that whistleblower protections are absolutely essential to detect fraud.
We agree with The Post that provisions related to disclosures of classified intelligence should be stricken from the legislation. But do not throw the baby out with the bath water.
Federal employees who blow the whistle on waste, fraud and abuse need strong protection, and so do the taxpayers.
STEPHEN KOHN
President
