District Briefing
Leaders Seek Switch to Natural Gas
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid said yesterday that they want to convert the U.S. Capitol power plant to burn only natural gas, calling it a key step in their effort to "green the Capitol."
The plant, opened in 1910, has been transformed in recent years from an obscure set of smokestacks in Southeast Washington to a symbol of Congress's -- and the country's -- energy dilemmas. Since they took over the House and Senate in 2006, Democrats have pushed to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions from the Capitol complex, but they have not succeeded in weaning the plant from emissions-heavy coal.
The move follows an order from Pelosi (D-Calif.) last year that the power plant use less-polluting natural gas for the House's share of the plant's output, estimated at 33 percent. Despite its name, the plant does not produce the Capitol's electricity. It produces steam and chilled water to heat and cool buildings, including House and Senate offices, the Library of Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court and Union Station.
In fiscal 2008, the plant generated about 65 percent of its power from natural gas, according to the Architect of the Capitol's office, which runs the plant. The architect's office said that about 35 percent of the plant's energy came from burning coal, down from 49 percent in 2007.
In yesterday's letter, Pelosi and Reid (D-Nev.) acknowledged that the plant might need to be retrofitted before it could burn only natural gas. Because of that, they said, "there are not projected to be any economical or feasible technologies to reduce coal-burning emissions soon."
-- David A. Fahrenthold


