FAIRFAX COUNTY

Officials Hedge Bets on Raising Property Taxes

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Sandhya Somashekhar
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 10, 2009

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors agreed yesterday to set the ceiling for a looming property tax increase so that the average homeowner sees an uptick of no more than $60, but officials said they will try to settle on a lower rate as they attempt to balance next year's budget.

Officials will not finalize the tax rate until next month, when they are slated to adopt a spending plan that reflects the realities of a nationwide recession and a plunge in area home values.

It is a bigger increase than many supervisors said they want -- up 14.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, which translates to an increase of about $60 on a home assessed at $459,228.

But they agreed yesterday to advertise, in legal notices for upcoming budget hearings, the higher rate of $1.05 per $100 of assessed value. They will also consider a 1.5-cent increase for a stormwater service charge. The vote effectively sets a limit on the amount the board can increase the tax rate. By advertising a higher rate, supervisors have left themselves some leeway in case the economy and the county's budget take another hit, they said.

"The news we've heard has gotten worse at every turn," said Supervisor Jeff C. McKay (D-Lee). "In this economy, unfortunately, a month is a long time."

Voting no were the board's two Republicans, who supported advertising a tax rate that was a penny lower. Supervisors Michael R. Frey (Sully) and Pat S. Herrity (Springfield) said it would send a better message and would prevent the board from being tempted by the $20 million an extra cent on the dollar would provide. But fellow Republican John Cook, a candidate for the vacant Braddock District seat on the board, said he did not object to yesterday's vote.

"The county can advertise whatever it wants. I understand the reasons for it," he said. But, he added, if he is on the board when the budget is finalized, "I'm not going to vote for $1.05."

The Democratic candidate, School Board member Ilryong Moon (D), said he would wait until the budget process runs its course before deciding what tax rate he favors. However, he said, he is "very doubtful" that he would support anything that puts a greater burden on the average taxpayer.

Carey C. Campbell, an independent, has said he does not want to increase property taxes. The three men face off at the polls today.

The board also voted to withdraw $18.7 million from its rainy day fund, a move officials had predicted in the fall would be needed to chip away at a $58 million shortfall in this year's budget. Current economic conditions allow the board to dip into the $102 million fund, which may be tapped only if revenue falls significantly below expectations. It is the first time the county has used the fund, which was established in 1999.



More from Virginia

[The Presidential Field]

Blog: Virginia Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

Local Blog Directory

Find a Local Blog

Plug into the region's blogs, by location or area of interest.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2009 The Washington Post Company