Kenneth Harney
The Nation's Housing

Disclosing Energy Efficiency

Video
Donovan explains the government's plan to stop foreclosures, who gets help paying their mortgage and how HUD insures that they keep their home for the long-term.
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Kenneth R. Harney
Saturday, April 11, 2009

Picture this: You're shopping for a home, dropping by open houses on a weekend. Each house you visit has an easy-to-understand disclosure about something that's typically unknown: its annual energy-guzzling costs.

The Obama administration's top housing official, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Shaun Donovan, says consumers deserve more information on the energy efficiency of the houses they buy, both resale and newly built. And he thinks mortgages should come with lower rates or better terms to encourage purchases and retrofits that save energy.

"When you buy a car, you know very clearly what the energy efficiency of that is because there's a number on the window. It says: Here's the gas mileage. We don't know that for housing," Donovan said in an interview

A Harvard-trained architect who ran New York City's Department of Housing Preservation and Development for four years before coming to HUD, Donovan said his agency is in the early stages of discussions with federal energy officials to develop "a relatively simple scoring system for housing that would allow you to understand what you're buying and at the same time allow lenders to underwrite that into their mortgage. Ultimately, if your energy bills are going to be lower, there ought to be some [mortgage] benefits to that."

The system might also factor in transportation costs to employment centers in some way, he said, because "most people don't realize that the average American family spends over 50 percent of their income on a combination of housing and transportation." Even with lower prices for houses in the far-flung suburbs, "their transportation costs are huge," he said, and metropolitan sprawl itself represents a massive energy-consumption inefficiency.

Mortgage terms -- higher loan amounts for buyers to make energy-conserving improvements, lower mortgage rates for energy-efficient homes -- "can be a very powerful tool" in residential energy conservation, he said, and the booming Federal Housing Administration insurance program would be a good place to start.

"If in the long run there's a cost of $5,000 to upgrade a house that will produce $10,000 in savings over time for utilities, the perfect tool to realize those savings is a mortgage," he said. Although Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA all have had versions of "energy-efficient mortgages" on the books for years, their programs have been poorly marketed and little used. Donovan wants to revive and improve the whole concept.

In a wide-ranging discussion, Donovan touched on a variety of other issues.

On national housing policy: He thinks that although "homeownership is a very important national goal," federal policy is "imbalanced" -- overwhelmingly favoring single-family ownership over rental housing options, which tend to allow greater density and more-efficient land use.

Rather than attempting to limit federal tax breaks that are heavily skewed to ownership, Donovan would prefer to expand and improve FHA's apartment-financing programs and produce more rental housing options in general.

"One of the reasons" President Obama named him to this Cabinet post, Donovan said, was "to bring HUD's multifamily rental [programs] into the 21st century."

On tax issues, Donovan believes there are millions of potential home buyers who do not itemize deductions and would not now qualify for money-saving write-offs for mortgage interest and property taxes. In his view, they should receive some form of federal tax break, as proposed by Obama during his campaign.

Donovan also said there has been a misperception about the administration's budget proposal to limit tax deductions for upper-income households earning $250,000 or more. This "wasn't targeted at the mortgage interest deduction," he said, but rather "was really about deductions more broadly," because taxpayers in higher brackets get far greater benefits for making charitable contributions or owning a home than households in the middle and lower brackets.

Donovan said he is "absolutely concerned" by the FHA's explosive growth -- from less than 3 percent market share during the boom years to more than 30 percent. Rapid expansion increases the potential for fraud and bad loans slipping through. So he is pressing appropriations committees for long-delayed money to upgrade the FHA's computer systems and monitoring ability and add staff.

Given the FHA's challenges, Donovan said he opposes reinstating the once-popular seller-financed down-payment assistance program, which allowed borrowers to obtain FHA-insured loans with no equity stakes. The Bush administration banned seller-financed down-payment assistance last year, citing high rates of early foreclosures and excessive losses. Home builders, real estate brokers and some congressional Democrats want to resume the program, but Donovan said, "I think the decision that was made" to kill the program "was the right decision."

Kenneth R. Harney's e-mail address is KenHarney@earthlink.net.



© 2009 The Washington Post Company