New Yankee Stadium a Home Run Haven So Far

This home run was one of eight in Saturday's game between the Yankees and Indians, one of 20 in the first four games at the new ballpark in the Bronx.
This home run was one of eight in Saturday's game between the Yankees and Indians, one of 20 in the first four games at the new ballpark in the Bronx. (By Nick Laham -- Getty Images)
  Enlarge Photo    
By Keith B. Richburg
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 22, 2009

NEW YORK, April 21 -- Maybe it's the wind, not unusual for April -- gusty, and sometimes blowing in strongly from the west.

Or maybe it's the right field wall, a couple of feet lower, and as much as nine feet closer to home plate.

Or it could be the gentle slope of the stands, rising more gradually from the field without the old sharply stacked tiers leading to the upper deck.

Maybe it was just bad pitching. Or the balls. Or if you are the superstitious type, perhaps it's the new incarnation of the fabled "Curse of the Bambino," with the game's greatest legend angry that the House That He Built has been torn down and replaced with a new edifice across the way.

Whatever it is, it ain't normal. After just four games (through Monday), 20 home runs had been hit at New York's new Yankee Stadium. And the vast majority of them, 14, had been hit right there, to right field, routine-looking fly balls that suddenly took off, whether by wind or luck or other-worldly intervention.

Twenty homers in the first four games sets a dubious record for a brand new ballpark. And with this stadium costing a whopping $1.5 billion, making it the most expensive in the country if not the world, many baseball fans and even some team officials are wondering whether a design flaw may have created an unintended hitter's haven for cheap home runs.

The Yankees have always been a team of big hitters, going back to the Bambino himself, Babe Ruth, a powerhouse lefty who aimed for that short right field porch in the old Yankee Stadium.

But last winter, the Yankees spent a reported $243.5 million to beef up their pitching staff -- and presumably would not want to see visiting team hitters salivating at the thought of a veritable wind tunnel over that expensive right field wall.

Other teams now adjusting to new stadiums during this April do not have similar issues. Across town in Queens, the Mets, playing at the new Citi Field, are finding the opposite problem -- home runs are tougher to hit than at the old Shea Stadium, with a stingy total of 10 in the first six games. And Nationals Park in Washington, in its second season on the Anacostia River, featured 18 homers in the first six games -- more because of the Nationals' pitching than the wind or sloping stands.

At this early date, in the first month of a long season, the new Yankee Stadium now tops the list of home run venues, with an average of five per game. By contrast, at Camden Yards in Baltimore, home to the Orioles and long known as a hitter's park, teams managed only 17 homers in the first six games.

There is no shortage of theories to explain this string of right field homers at Yankee Stadium, so let's start with the first: the weather.

Last Friday and Saturday, when most of those homers were hit, the winds were from the west, at between 12 and 25 mph, according to Meteorologists said it is possible that the shell of the new stadium could cause high winds to blow across the field uninterrupted, unlike the old Yankee Stadium, where the stacking of the seats produced more of a swirl effect.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company