The Wizards' Bad Luck in the NBA Draft Lottery Shouldn't Necessarily Mean a Bad Pick

By Michael Wilbon
Wednesday, May 20, 2009

BRISTOL, Conn. Okay, it's not a night to celebrate when you lose to the Clippers and Grizzlies in anything, even a game of chance. A night that began with the promise of Blake Griffin ended the moment the Grizzlies moved from the sixth spot into the top three. You could have clicked over to "American Idol" right then and there.

Sure enough, the Wizards came away with the worst-possible result in the NBA draft lottery: fifth.

That means no Griffin, who could have become the power player the Wizards so desperately need. Finishing fifth means no Ricky Rubio, who could have become the true playmaking point guard the Wizards could have used to craft a more balanced offense. It means no Hasheem Thabeet, who could have been the defensive anchor the Wizards have been missing for years. It's awful to lose to the Clippers, who never know what they're doing, and the Grizzlies, whose owner cares only about not spending money.

But that ends -- I promise -- the negative portion of this column. I'm going to put on my Virtual GM hat here and tell you that there's potentially great news for the Wizards coming on or around draft night.

Seriously, there is.

Start with those very same Los Angeles Clippers, the ones who can't get anything right, the ones who in 1998 upon winning the lottery took Michael Olowokandi over Paul Pierce, Dirk Nowitzki, Vince Carter and Antawn Jamison. Let's just say the Clippers get it right this time and take Griffin with the No. 1 pick they secured Tuesday night in the lottery.

That means they'd have center Chris Kaman, center Marcus Camby, power forward Zach Randolph and promising young forward Al Thornton. The Clippers almost have to wind up keeping Kaman, Griffin and Thornton as their starting front line, which actually figures to be a good one.

That means Camby will soon be available. Actually, he was available at the all-star break in February. It also means Randolph, who can use his brawn to get you 20 points and 10 rebounds a game from the low block, will also soon be available. Randolph's no Boy Scout off the court, but he can supply the inside muscle the Wizards don't have. And Camby, while he isn't the offensive threat Randolph is, averaged 13 rebounds and 3 1/2 blocks a game just the season before last for Denver. Okay, Camby is 35. But youngsters don't win jack in the NBA and Camby's salary would come off the books in the free agent-loaded summer of 2010. If I needed, for salary cap purposes, to trade one of my own players or involve a third team or trade the overall No. 5 pick, I'd have my eye on Camby and the under-the-radar Steve Novak, a 42 percent shooter from three-point range.

Or just suppose that the Clippers, feeling they already have enough firepower in the front court, decide to trade down to get a veteran player or players? Well, maybe the Wizards can get involved that way.

The point is that the Wizards need a big man first and foremost and bigs are available.

Also, the thing this draft has in abundance is point guards. Watching the draft lottery last night in the ESPN studios, Magic Johnson, considering the Wizards' personnel and what they might pick up in the draft if they keep their pick, said, "Who's your point guard?"

My answer, of course, was, "Gilbert Arenas?"

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company