In the Words of Sonia Sotomayor
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Columbia Law School, 1999:
"It is all too easy as a prosecutor to feel the pain and suffering of victims and to forget that defendants, despite whatever illegal act they have committed, however despicable their acts may have been, the defendants are human beings who have families and people who care for and love them. Appreciating this fact does not excuse reprehensible behavior but it at least opens the door to understanding, and that is a step toward justice."
Women's Bar Association of the state of New York, 1999:
"Whether born from experience or inherent physiological differences . . . our gender makes and will make a difference in our judging. In short, I accept the proposition that a difference will be made by the presence of women on the bench and that my experiences will affect the facts that I choose to see as a judge. I simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging, but I accept there will be some based on my gender and the experiences it has imposed on me."
Introduction of Justice Antonin Scalia at Hofstra Law School, 2001:
"I understand Justice Scalia's jurisprudence to begin with a proposition that we should all agree to: namely, that judges should try to interpret the law correctly and without personal or political bias. He has, however, become one of the most important and outspoken proponents of the idea that following this norm requires the adoption of a particular interpretive methodology, namely that of formalism and plain meaning. . . . I do not mean to suggest -- and the justice will be the first to agree with me on this one -- that any of these thoughts are uncontroversial."



![[The Supreme Court]](http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/10/21/GR2005102100770.gif)
![[Guantanamo Prison]](http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2005/04/04/PH2005040400425.jpg)
