Your Crash Coverage Was First-Rate -- Mostly

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Saturday, June 27, 2009

I am one of those longtime subscribers who has been disheartened by changes to The Post over the past few years.

But the paper's coverage of Monday's Metro crash has been astounding. The Post's mixture of factual reporting (sorely missing in other media coverage), graphics to help understand the mechanics of what happened, personal stories and perspectives from experts has reminded me of how The Post earned its reputation as one of the country's greatest newspapers.

So, I'll make you a deal: I'll continue to stick with The Post through its adjustments to a changing marketplace, if the paper rises to the occasion for a big story, as it has done this week.

-- Laura Collins

University Park

--


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2009 The Washington Post Company