» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

Robert McCartney: Metro Co-Workers Proud of Train Operator's Courage

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Robert McCartney
Sunday, June 28, 2009

Jeanice McMillan was a working person. She earned $18.20 an hour operating Red Line trains. She couldn't afford a car, because she was paying tuition so her son could attend college, which she never did. She belonged to a union, one that Metro management sometimes portrays as greedy and pampered.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

Nonetheless, McMillan was subject to a kind of professional code of conduct, like those associated with the lawyers and doctors who rode in her train and earn $200 an hour or more. In a crisis, that code requires an operator to stay calm, remain at his or her post and push the "mushroom" braking device even as the train is hurtling into a horrific crash.

Among Metro employees, the worry lurks that a panicked train operator might rush back into the passenger area to seek safety. It's a matter of deep pride that workers in risky, responsible positions perform well in such situations. That reflects a culture of public service within the transit system for which it typically gets less credit than it deserves.

So, as details emerged last week about Monday's Red Line crash, Metro's employees paid close attention to how McMillan had acted. She was in the cab of Train 112 as it barreled around a bend and smashed into Train 214, unexpectedly halted near Fort Totten Station in Northeast, killing McMillan and eight passengers and injuring 80.

Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689 also cared about McMillan's performance because it reflected on the union's image and thus could affect members' pocketbooks. It's at odds with management over a new contract, a dispute in arbitration.

To the intense relief of her colleagues, everything known so far about the crash suggests that McMillan acted properly. Federal safety investigators reported that she had pressed the red, mushroom-shaped braking device. Bluish heat burns on the train's wheels and track showed hard braking had begun 300 to 400 feet before impact.

After inspectors said they would check McMillan's cellphone records to make sure she hadn't been distracted by talking or texting -- reports that especially infuriated her colleagues -- the cellphone was discovered tucked safely in her backpack.

"She didn't run or jump out of her seat," said J.J. Nixon, a shop steward and union executive board member for rail operations. "We don't talk about the fear. We just pray it doesn't happen," he said. "We all think about it every day."

Timothy Harris of Accokeek, who retired in 2006 after 22 years as a train operator, said, "If she applied that brake 300 to 400 feet before impact, she had to have been paying attention."

A female Red Line operator with 10 years' experience, who knew McMillan, said she lived up to standards.

"She was a sweet young woman, but she was always a professional," the operator said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of Metro rules against speaking to the media without a supervisor's permission. She said McMillan "did the job of a veteran" despite just three months' experience driving Metro trains on her own.

Instead of an error by McMillan, all indications so far are that technology was at fault. McMillan's train was on automatic operation, similar to cruise control. Initial tests suggest that an electrical circuit, which could have blocked signals that would have alerted her to the stopped train ahead of her, had failed. "She didn't fail the system. The system failed her," several colleagues said.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity