What's Best for Afghanistan
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
Regarding the July 1 front-page article "Key in Afghanistan: Economy, Not Military":
The strategic shift from military occupation and pacification to economic development in Afghanistan is the most promising development yet. For reform to truly take root, and thus vindicate our actions in that country, economic development must take place and empower the people of Afghanistan.
The United States has the ability to jump-start the process of economic development. Rather than attempt to dictate what can be produced, how it should be produced, and where it should be distributed, the role of the U.S. government and military should be to aid in building infrastructure. This would empower Afghan entrepreneurs to bring their products to market, thus creating expansive markets for products over the long run and allowing those with the appropriate knowledge to produce what they know Afghans want and need.
This process of empowerment will lead to future economic success and peace.
JASON SYMONIAK
Arlington
