When the Label Says 'Organic'
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
While the debate over what constitutes "organic" food is fascinating, it isn't entirely clear why we're having it ["Purity of Federal 'Organic' Label Is Questioned," front page, July 3]. Whether or not a food or additive is ultimately determined to be organic, we know that it is safe -- after all, it can be found elsewhere on our grocery shelves.
Indeed, food is labeled "organic" for the same reason some food is labeled "kosher" -- to meet the preferences of certain consumers. Why then, as with kosher foods, shouldn't the organic label be administered by a private licensing board instead of the government?
ZACHARY DAVID SKAGGS
Washington
--
To paraphrase the prophetic social critic Eric Hoffer: Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business and turns into a racket.
Reflecting upon the Agriculture Department's self-inflicted loss of credibility during the mad-cow beef fiasco of a few years ago, it's easy to see that the department spends little time serving as a consumer safety and protection enterprise. Instead, it appears to view its mission as supporting the rackets dreamed up by members of Big Food to expand their sales. Heaven help those of us who just want the food we eat to be untainted, because clearly the USDA isn't going to.
KATHRYN L. KELLAM
Alexandria
