'Harry Potter' and the Prelude to a Kiss

By Monica Hesse
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 15, 2009

How good is The Kiss?

The Potterites lining up for opening showings of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" will studiously examine the film for its treatment of these crucial plot points: The development of Tom Riddle from creepy orphan to wicked Lord Voldemort. The revelation of the dark magic of Horcruxes. The question of whether Hermione performed a Confundus charm during a Quidditch match. These things are very important in the Potterverse.

But for some readers, they are not as important as The Kiss.

The Kiss in question is the brief lip-lock between protagonist Harry and his pal Ginny, though the sixth installment of the teen wizard series contains a cornucopia of other bumbling, fumbling, mumbling hormonal activity.

Ginny snogs Dean. Ron snogs Lavender (Ew). Hermione snogs Cormac (Eww). Sidekicks Ron and Hermione fess up to their festering crush (fans anticipating that kiss, alas, must wait for Movie 7 or 8). "Half-Blood Prince" is when Cupid's arrows fired in nineteen-freaking-ninety-seven finally hit their targets.

This is major stuff. The Potter series is first and foremost an adventure series, but it's also the place where a vast number of young readers first read about stomach-butterflies, heartbreak and the agony of unrequited crushes. Harry/Ginny = Romeo/Juliet = Luke/Laura -- or at least, they did until a sultry young half-vampire couple appeared on the scene.

"Am really looking forward to not only *THE KISS*, but the scenes before it when Harry is having his internal struggle," wrote a fan,who calls herself dumblegirl on a Harry Potter message board. "This is one of the best parts of the entire series . . . his future, his heart, his life. Oh, warm fuzzy feeling!"

Dumblegirl posted this back in 2007. That's when everyone thought "Half-Blood Prince" would be released in 2008. But it wasn't. Warner Bros. postponed the November release for money reasons, and then Summit Entertainment swooped into the slot with a paranormal romance of its own -- a little movie called "Twilight." And the whole kiss thing changed context and meaning. "Twilight," a vampire romance based on the first book of Stephenie Meyer's series, tapped into the youth market that J.K. Rowling had been grooming for more than a decade. "Twilight" also has A Kiss. It is 29 seconds long. It happens in a dimly lit bedroom, in underwear, between human Bella, who is eager for hanky-panky, and her vampire boyfriend, Edward, who resists hanky-panky because A) he's still not sure whether he wants more to smooch Bella or drink her blood, and B) Edward's literally granite-hard body is so masculine and strong and forceful that the passion of a sexual encounter might literally kill her. Oh my.

For an analysis of these two approaches in teen romance, let's go to John Granger, the author of "Harry Potter's Bookshelf" who is also working on a book about "Twilight."

"Harry is basically a Gothic heroine," Granger says. He "may have a love figure, but you get the [romantic] payoff after a long wait." Meaning . . . " 'Harry Potter' is 'Pride and Prejudice' with wands."

It's all misunderstandings and mistaken identities, people saying things they don't mean and then feeling awkward. And when relationships do happen, they are subtle, hand-holding affairs.

With "Twilight," it's all glistening chests and luscious lips and naughty thoughts. Swooning is prevalent.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company