» This Story:Read +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments
Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Discussion   |   Podcast   |   Opinions Home

Two Bipartisan Paths to Health-Care Reform

Former senator Tom Daschle, right, and former Senate majority leader Bob Dole, in background, have teamed with former senator Howard Baker to offer a health-reform plan.
Former senator Tom Daschle, right, and former Senate majority leader Bob Dole, in background, have teamed with former senator Howard Baker to offer a health-reform plan. (By Susan Walsh -- Associated Press)
  Enlarge Photo    

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Ruth Marcus
Wednesday, July 29, 2009

If only Democrats and Republicans could get together and produce a health-care bill that would expand coverage and control costs.

This Story
This Story

But wait -- there is such a proposal. In fact, there are two.

The first, which would, in a more perfect world, be my preference, is the measure devised by the odd couple of the Senate, Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon and Republican Robert Bennett of Utah. This bill not only has the merit of being demonstrably bipartisan but has been scored by the Congressional Budget Office as fully paid for.

The problem is that the Wyden-Bennett plan would essentially blow up the existing, although rickety, system of employer-sponsored insurance, which is both the substantive attraction and the political drawback.

Under Wyden-Bennett, states would set up purchasing pools through which individuals would obtain insurance. Employers could still offer theirs, but that would probably dwindle over time. Individuals would be required to get coverage, with subsidies to those with lower incomes; Medicaid would be eliminated in favor of full subsidies for the poorest Americans. The subsidies would be financed by ending the current tax-free treatment of employer-provided health insurance, a move that would have the added benefit of constraining costs.

These would be huge changes, which may be why, despite its sponsors' indefatigable efforts, the proposal hasn't gotten traction.

There is, however, a more politically sustainable, deficit-neutral alternative, crafted by three former Senate majority leaders -- Democrat Tom Daschle, President Obama's erstwhile choice as health-care czar, and Republicans Bob Dole and Howard Baker. Staffing the work for the Bipartisan Policy Center were Chris Jennings, a veteran of the Clinton health reform efforts, and Mark McClellan, who ran the Medicare and Medicaid programs under George W. Bush.

If Wyden-Bennett is the equivalent of a tear-down of the health-care system, the Bipartisan Policy Center proposal is more of an extensive renovation.

And -- have I mentioned this? -- a bipartisan one.

It was released last month, to praise from the leadership of the Senate Finance Committee, Montana Democrat Max Baucus and Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley, but more muted murmurings from the White House.

It's time to take another look. To switch from a real estate metaphor to a romantic one, the Bipartisan Policy Center proposal is like the nice guy you weren't thrilled about dating. He started to look a lot better after you tried some of the alternatives.

The group finessed one hot-button issue, whether there should be a public plan to compete with private insurers, by giving states the option of establishing their own public plans and providing for the option of a federal plan if state-level efforts don't work.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments

More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity