Murtha's Earmarking Not Unusual Among Subcommittee Members

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 9, 2009; 2:22 PM

A senior congressman's controversial pattern of steering lucrative defense contracts to firms represented by his close friends and former staffers is a common practice among his fellow members on a powerful appropriations subcommittee, according to a new analysis by a watchdog group.

Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), chairman of the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee, has been criticized by ethics and taxpayer advocacy groups for channeling hundreds of millions of Pentagon dollars to companies represented by lobbying firms headed by close associates who are also major donors to his campaigns.

Using a computer analysis of public records, the Center for Public Integrity found that 12 of the committee's 16 members have mimicked Murtha's pattern of earmarking, providing targeted military funds to specific contractors represented by former staffers and friends. Numerous investigative stories have focused on projects Murtha and fellow lawmakers Peter J. Visclosky (D-Ind.) and James P. Moran (D-Va.) have funded with military money, but other committee members' earmark requests have not faced similar scrutiny.

Since the fall of last year, federal investigators have been probing the PMA Group, a former lobbying firm with close ties to Murtha. The firm's clients had unusual success in winning targeted earmarks from Murtha's committee. Founder Paul Magliocchetti is a close friend of Murtha's and worked as an appropriations staffer when Murtha was a member of the committee.

According to the center's analysis, which focused on the 2008 fiscal year, the pattern of steering earmarks to clients of the lawmakers' former staffers who had become lobbyists involved 50 earmarks and campaign donations of more than $1 million. A significant chunk of the money was steered to clients of PMA, but also to clients of another 10 lobbying firms, including such prominent firms as Van Scoyoc Associates Inc. and Innovative Strategies, formerly Copeland Lowery Jaquez Denton & White.

A spokesman in Murtha's office could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning on the Center's report.



More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2009 The Washington Post Company