Passions High Among Israelis Ahead of Talks on Settlement Freeze

By Howard Schneider
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, September 12, 2009

ARIEL, West Bank -- The scene from the Dr. Billye Brim Community Pool, named after the American pastor from Branson, Mo., who helped underwrite it, is decidedly suburban and removed from the international fray over Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

The modern design lets in ample sunlight and fresh air for swimmers doing laconic laps in the midafternoon, while sunbathers lounge on a courtyard of clipped grass spotted with white umbrellas. The more energetic pound away on treadmills in a swanky fitness center.

Yet it is here that the competing visions of the West Bank collide. Israel contends that towns such as Ariel, with a population approaching 20,000, should continue to build and grow; the United States insists on a freeze in settlement construction to help restart peace talks; the Palestinians demand that settlement efforts stop and the land be turned over for a future Palestinian state.

White House special envoy George J. Mitchell is slated to arrive in Israel this weekend for negotiations aimed at brokering at least a partial halt in settlement activity so that peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians can resume. But he does so as Israeli backlash grows against any extensive curbs on building in an area that has come to be seen not just as part of the national religious heritage but as a strategic buffer, a reservoir of cheap industrial land and a catch basin for suburban sprawl.

Israel may be willing to give up large parts of it in a peace agreement, as Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu outlined in a June speech. But until an agreement is reached, there's a push for development to proceed.

"I don't call Ariel a settlement; it's a gated community," said Mayor Ron Nachman, adding that he and others were "responding to the government's call" 32 years ago when they started the community on a hilltop deep in the central West Bank.

The Palestinians and much of the rest of the world regard the settlements as illegal under international law meant to prevent an occupying power from taking over land by moving people. Israel regards the area not as occupied but "disputed," and over three decades it has added people, buildings and infrastructure.

About 300,000 Israelis live in 120 authorized communities and dozens of unauthorized ones in the West Bank. The numbers do not include Jerusalem.

Ariel's location was chosen to help control the approach to Tel Aviv, a fact that adds to the complexity of the settlement project and helps explain why Obama's call to curb its growth sparked a strong Israeli reaction.

Israel occupied the West Bank, which was then under Jordanian control, during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. The first settlements grew out of religious sentiment toward sites such as Hebron, where the biblical patriarch Abraham is thought to be entombed, and included efforts to reestablish a Jewish presence in areas where Jews had been forced to leave in the years before Israel's independence in 1948, said Yossi Klein Halevi, a senior fellow at the Shalem Center, a think tank closely allied with the Netanyahu government.

That attachment underpins many of the settlements -- the residents of largely secular Ariel note the nearby burial place of Joshua, Moses's successor, while many West Bank enclaves draw their rationale from the Bible. But strategic, economic and other concerns became the dominant validation for an undertaking that, over time, has become too big and complex to reverse.

The larger settlements were meant "to push the border back" and leave Israel with a wider, more defensible center, Halevi said. "That has very little to do with historical claim and nothing to do with religious sentiment. The rationale was survival. That's why these urban centers speak viscerally to mainstream Israelis."

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company